On 10/24/2023 9:15 AM, Paul Mcl wrote:
and he confirmed that was correct and he was using a large
rhombic by the ocean.
Consider the dimensions of a Rhombic for 160M, and that to benefit for
being "by the ocean," the QSO would have been long path.
73, Jim K9YC
_
Searchable
Tree,
Is that the op the WB6 I worked twice:
160m on 24Nov22 @ 2130Z
80m on 7Dec/22 @ 2215Z
I emailed shortly after to ask if he was transmitting from CA per his
QRZ.com details and he confirmed that was correct and he was using a large
rhombic by the ocean. Both contacts are confirmed in
I can only guess :-
---
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua
Mike Waters писал 2023-10-24 19:05:
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023, 10:55 AM uy0zg via Topband
wrote:
But it’s better not to be sad :-
Beautiful advice! :-)
Let’s congratulate Dmitry,
UT5UGR - yesterday, in a
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023, 10:55 AM uy0zg via Topband
wrote:
>
> But it’s better not to be sad :-
Beautiful advice! :-)
Let’s congratulate Dmitry,
> UT5UGR - yesterday, in a desperate dash, he finally got into the T2C
> log!
>
What antennas did each of them use, do you know?
73 Mike
Hi
But it’s better not to be sad :- Let’s congratulate Dmitry,
UT5UGR - yesterday, in a desperate dash, he finally got into the T2C
log!
In the conditions of colossal city noise, he made contact. The only one
from Ukraine. It's almost a historical event.
There is no one from
Tree and everyone:
Sadly, cheating has "always been a thing".(I'd like to think a little "less
so" in ham radio)_I love this hobby and the great people I've met because of
it.
Back in the early 1990's there was a K7 station from the PNW(no, not
K7RAT,hi) who had some kind of landline
While I hesitate to post this, at some point, this behavior needs to be
called out for what it is.
Believe it or not - there is a station who has a well established pattern
of working DX on 160 meters from "California". I use quotes here, because
this station claims to be in California, or the
ght it
| > up. . .hi. Also, if you waiting in anticipation of the "approaching
| > low band season" I regret to inform you it's half over. 73. .
| > . Dave, W0FLS
| > -Original Message- From: STEVE DANIEL
| > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2020 9:31 PM
| > To: topband@co
> .hi. Also, if you waiting in anticipation of the "approaching low band
> season" I regret to inform you it's half over. 73. . . Dave, W0FLS
>
> -Original Message-
> From: STEVE DANIEL
> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2020 9:31 PM
> To: topban
low band season" I regret to inform you it's half over. 73. .
. Dave, W0FLS
-Original Message- From: STEVE DANIEL
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2020 9:31 PM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: Remote operation
Let's see. It has been at least five years since RHR'
nt: Friday, February 07, 2020 9:31 PM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: Remote operation
Let's see. It has been at least five years since RHR's "remote operation for
the masses" hit the air waves. After several years of hand-wringing, teeth
gnashing and proclamations tha
Let's see. It has been at least five years since RHR's "remote operation for
the masses" hit the air waves. After several years of hand-wringing, teeth
gnashing and proclamations that the amateur world as we know it is ending the
ARRL made it clear that remote operations, so long as they
Very well said, Dave. You are an emotionally mature fellow, as most folks
here are.
I don't often join in with discussions like these, but ...
Some individuals simply decide to whine and complain. That's just a fact.
And that'll never change. A recurring theme on this reflector. Finally, our
Neither
What is killing amateur radio is that for most young people it is not
relevant. When you can chat face to face anywhere in the world with a PC
and cell phone they ( understandably) don't see the attraction or
experience the thrill of hanging up a wire and waiting for
sunset/sunrise
Joel,
Have another Margarita. Things will improve greatly.
Jacques
On 10/13/2019 6:15 PM, w...@w5zn.org wrote:
OK I'm confused..was it remotes or FT8 that killed amateur radio??
Or maybe the 50 other chicken little proclamations that did?
I need professional help to sort this all out
OK I'm confused..was it remotes or FT8 that killed amateur radio??
Or maybe the 50 other chicken little proclamations that did?
I need professional help to sort this all out (that's a given, so please
don't comment on that condition!)
73 Joel W5ZN
_
Searchable Archives:
Let's see. It has been at least five years since RHR's "remote operation for
the masses" hit the air waves. After several years of hand-wringing, teeth
gnashing and proclamations that the amateur world as we know it is ending the
ARRL made it clear that remote operations, so long as they adhere
It does not make you wonder we all know EXACTLY what is going on, and
its illegal, and going to become commonplace.
Disgusting
73
W5FI Gary
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 2:41 PM, steve.r...@culligan4water.com wrote:
Anybody else hear the UA4 in the Navassa pileup last night?
Sorry to drag out this matter but maybe someone will share by take on
it. This whole concept is treading on thin ice as far as the hobby is
concerned. Operators with only a computer can conceivably build up
their DXCC totals without even having an actual station and work DX
siting in their
Anybody else hear the UA4 in the Navassa pileup last night? Hearing Europe from
here is kind of a big deal. Hearing Eastern Europe or Russia is a bigger deal.
Not hearing anything else from Europe except a UA4 that's S-9 ? Makes you
wonder.
73 Steve K0SR
_
Topband Reflector
I have all of my licenses, starting with a Novice in 1964. The last one
that specified a Fixed Station Operation Location was issued in 1984.
73, Jim N7US
-Original Message-
On Mon,2/2/2015 2:32 AM, Dragoslav Balaban wrote:
Callsign is assigned to HAM for Station, and Station have
Hi,
While I agree in principle I question whether the receiver and it's
location have legal identification requirements. In the U.S.A. at least,
receivers and their operators are NOT licensed. Transmitters and
transmitter operation are. One guideline I saw suggested a remote
receiver -
-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of m.r.
Sent: Monday, 02 February, 2015 06:07
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Remote Operation
To me the remote operation ethics have always been clear, and still are.
It makes absolutely NO difference where the operator is sitting. The
contact
US hams who were licensed in the 50's will remember that you got a separate
Operator's license and Station license. At some point the FCC merged the two --
probably to save paper.
Tod, K0TO
Sent from my iPad air
On Feb 2, 2015, at 5:47 AM, Bill Cromwell wrcromw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon,2/2/2015 2:32 AM, Dragoslav Balaban wrote:
Callsign is assigned to HAM for Station, and Station have physical /
geographic Location , Latitude/Longitude..
That is no longer true for US hams, since the 1970s. Our license is an
operator license only, the address is a mailing address
Hi,
I just pulled my last license (now expired) from the desk drawer and
looked at it. It refers to my primary station and has the physical
address. I'm pretty sure my current license will bear the same
information. It's up for renewal and maybe the new one will be
different. Other parts of
26 matches
Mail list logo
