Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 107, Issue 28

2011-11-20 Thread Bob Eldridge
Hi Barry But it's taking up a lot of band width for no apparent reason. in my own humble opinion, any further discussion is a waste of cyberspace. I, for one, have not found it boring. I don't believe we now know all there is to know, and text does not take much file space. Some just

Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 107, Issue 28

2011-11-20 Thread Gedking
Some people would rather play with antennas than get on the air, if that's their thing go for it. ME I would rather get on the air and work stations. I just let my auto tuner make the rig happy losses on 160 are not that high. But then I remember a time when I needed a station on 24 Mhz so I

Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 107, Issue 28

2011-11-20 Thread John Harden
On 11/20/2011 5:58 PM, gedk...@aol.com wrote: Some people would rather play with antennas than get on the air, if that's their thing go for it. ME I would rather get on the air and work stations. I just let my auto tuner make the rig happy losses on 160 are not that high. But then I remember

Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 107, Issue 28

2011-11-20 Thread Hardy Landskov
is no matter what you have as an antenna, the propagation rules. GL 73 Hardy N7RT - Original Message - From: John Harden jh...@bellsouth.net To: topband@contesting.com Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2011 4:14 PM Subject: Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 107, Issue 28 On 11/20/2011 5