When someone is doing something wrong we should not "out" or embarrass them.
You should try to settle the situation offline without leaving any bad feelings.
If you know the offender you should discuss it with him (or her) person to
person. Be diplomatic.
Don't lecture to them, discuss it
Guys, did anybody work Joe WL7E this morning? he said he worked all across the
US. I was too engulfed with K5P on 80 meters, which BTW he peaked nicely at
around 7:30 local time and he worked me and Gary,KA1J one right after another.
Before that peak no luck. We lucked out and had a short
Any old timers ever work W1MDG Earl E. Babbidge, Dark Harbor, Maine in the
late 1940's, early 1950's
on 160 meters.
As a kid in school at the time, I did errands for W1KNJ in Belfast who was a
semi-invalid, in return I received code practice. As i improved
he put me at his key for the
Good advice. I suggest taking it a step farther.
It is the rare ham who takes criticism, even constructive, well. So,...
Privately suggest to them how doing it differently will increase their fun,
will increase their chances of making the QSO. Suggest listening a bit.
Suggest timing. Etcetera.
The big problem is that this "system" works! It's simple statistics. The more
times you
send your call, the better chance of the DX picking it out of a pileup.
I don't think the people that do this give a rats behind if they're calling on
top of
someone else. They are like people who cut in
Reminds me of our 'catch and release' justice? system.
Doug/VE5RA
I wasn't born in Saskatchewan, but I got here as soon as I could.
-Original Message-
Good advice. I suggest taking it a step farther.
It is the rare ham who takes criticism, even constructive, well. So,...
Privately
Guido,
>>> It sounds strange, because to have 45,6 uH with 20 turns the Al should be
1140.
Thanks a lot. Sure I was wrong with inductance.
For 20 turns:
T-300A-2 AL=228, L=9.12uH
T-300-2 AL=114, L=4.56uH
To get same inductance on T-300-2 need to have 28T. But coupling will
between primary and
Good point. I use that same technique when the callers get out of sync.
What appears to be lids are actually folks who are out of sync. I gave the
callsign twice on 160 phone from Clipperton to keep things under control.
I will admit that I have used the continuous calling technique when the DX
That's correct, and the ones who do it know it. It's a real nasty way to "tail
end". "Tail ending" is nothing new and has been proven also as a tactic.
Sometimes it works real good and it all depends on the Dx operator and his
habits. Constant calling is a combination of tail ending and what
Message: 12
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:38:05 -0500
From: Don Kirk
To: Roger D Johnson
Cc: topband
Subject: Re: Topband: K5P good job !
I've heard a few DXpedition operators on 160 meters use the "sending calls
two times" technique
hi roger,
just what do you mean by "calling on top of someone else"? of course they are
since a rare station creates so many callers that it is impossible to find a
calling frequency that is clear. even if it seems clear doesn't mean that it
actually is. there are probably tons of stations
Great to hear the dialogue!! I have been chasing DX since the summer of
1959... Those who don't get through are never happy... It takes big
antennas, maximum legal power, and some operating skill.
It sort of like being in a combat theater. It only matters who is still
standing the next day.
It's apparent that some people have a very "creative" way of interpreting FCC
regulations. If
you want to operate YOUR station within the law, read and understand Part 97.
Do NOT
believe what anyone tells you. They are usually WRONG!
73, Roger
_
Topband Reflector Archives -
I was holding back on posting a comment on this topic of continuous calling
(I actually typed out a response but deleted it twice yesterday) but
thought I would finally hit the send key in an attempt to should shed some
light on part of the problem as well as a partial solution (not a complete
I got distracted and forgot to ask..if the offending QRN (electric fence in
my case) is in the same direction of interest (Europe for me), does that
mean all signals in that direction are nulled?
(I would think not, but I have never used one, so pardon the question)
Mike VE9AA
Mike,
Probablybut that depends on where on the fence itself the actual
voltage breakdown is taking place. The electric fence may propagate the
noise like a long wire but you might get lucky with the NCC-1. I'm not
sure but I believe the best to do in your circumstances is to use an
antenna that
After nearly two years of trying to get some measurable improvement with
the MFJ-1026 noise cancelling box I finally gave up and sold them on
E-Bay and purchased a DX-Engineering NCC-1. The frustration of the
finicky controls on the MFJ was time consuming and I never was able to
realize much
Herb,
This is very interesting to me. I hope this helps your noise. I have had
11 glorious year of owning a silent QTH. Now I have a neighbour who has an
electric fence which bothers me terribly.
Spikes are every second (or so) and on 160m they are 20/9 (and that's with
the NB on ! ! ! )
18 matches
Mail list logo