whats the issue ??
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
what are we talking about here ?? Are stations claiming qsos they didn’t
make ? how would they get DXCC credit for them if the other station didn’t
agree either by an LOTW response or a QSL card ?they forging QSL cards ? if
there is any doubt about a QSL card’s validity, it seems to me the ARRL
Contacts made using remote stations located someplace much closer than
the Ukraine. There are many many many other abusers doing this.
On 10/9/2019 4:47 PM, jayb1...@optonline.net wrote:
what are we talking about here ?? Are stations claiming qsos they didn’t
make ? how would they get DXCC
...
https://clublog.org/charts/?c=ZK3A
Who will stop this idiocy?
In a year or two this will finally kill the topband :
http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20191009-A4.pdf#page=1=auto,-12,848
--
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua
_
Searchable Archives: http
this idiocy?
In a year or two this will finally kill the topband :
http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20191009-A4.pdf#page=1=auto,-12,848
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
Reflector
_
Searchable Archives: http
?
In a year or two this will finally kill the topband :
http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20191009-A4.pdf#page=1=auto,-12,848
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
DXCC card checkers have to put the QSO time on sheets that are submitted for
DXCC. If the station did not work ZK3A at a time that is reasonable based on
sunrise/sunset, then ARRL will not count the credit. A station could
theoretically use a remote station that had propagation to the DX
Il 09/10/2019 09:14, uy0zg wrote:
Who will stop this idiocy?
The DXCC Desk, if they want. The question is: they will do it?
Regards
Paolo I4EWH
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
They want to have this country for farce.
In their understanding, this is very prestigious ...
Of course, not everyone will qualify for DXCC today.
But the ARRL leadership needs to do at least something.
At least to find a way to catch these coyotes receiving via WEB.SDR
---
Nick, UY0ZG
Il 09/10/2019 20:04, n...@windstream.net ha scritto:
DXCC card checkers have to put the QSO time on sheets that are submitted for
DXCC.
I believe that no one pays attention to the timetable, and nobody pays
attention to the report written by the controller if the QSL seems
false. Don't
Greg, apparently, is a very kind person and believes in justice
-
But for justice, something needs to be done.
---
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua
Paolo Zaffi писал 2019-10-09 21:37:
Il 09/10/2019 20:04, n...@windstream.net ha scritto:
DXCC card checkers have to put the QSO time
Cheating goes back a long ways. It surely predates ham radio by eons.
I know personally, when I was on Sable Island in 1996 as CY0AA we got QSL
cards for impossible QSO's.
ie: 6m cards from the Netherlands when I worked NONE.
Another 1 or 2, 160m cards for noontime local. I tossed them in
12 matches
Mail list logo
