Topband: 160M Conditions

2023-01-28 Thread Pete Smith N4ZR
This snapshot of RBN spots over the last 36 hours is a little disappointing. Is there really an international contest on? -- 73, Pete N4ZR _ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

Re: Topband: 160M Conditions

2023-01-28 Thread Roger Stein
Shucks Pete, that’s propagation for you. I snared 37 DXC in last nights session from here in Nova Scotia with my K2AV FCP and SAL-20 or new SGA, (Shared Ground Array) beta version from Mark. Running just 600 watts. Many, many, did I say many? US stations could not hear the EU DX and plopped on

Re: Topband: 160M Conditions

2023-01-28 Thread n4is
Hi Peter Signals from Europe were not strong but I worked over 50 counties on the first night. Few days ago Eddy XV1X signal was very good "long path" really SSW-SSW, CW solid 559, and just yesterday morning several station on the east coast worked XV1X on FT8. JT1CO is active, BY, HL JA's, 3W1T.

Re: Topband: 160M Conditions

2023-01-28 Thread Pete Smith N4ZR
No, just an error of understanding on my part.  I did a lookup for the last 36 hours, but the map only plots the last 100 spots, something that I should have realized but hadn't.  Apologies to everyone. 73, Pete N4ZR On 1/28/2023 8:59 AM, Tim Shoppa wrote: Context, Pete? Maybe you had some

Topband: cqww160 - Night One - not too shabby 148Q's-46 sects -24DX mults

2023-01-28 Thread W3HKK
Noticed what sounded like a below average number of stations on the air last night. BUT heard a couple dozen Euros on from 2200z-z which was a pleasant surprise. However, it was very tough to make it through the European QRM they were hearing. Things got a bit better later in the evening, but

Topband: 160M Conditions - CQWW

2023-01-28 Thread Roger Kennedy
I wouldn't say conditions were GOOD last night, as the NA big guns are normally several S units stronger over here, but they were OK. I didn't get home from work til 0330Z last night (doing extra gigs for a couple of weeks) But I came on for just over an hour and managed to work 35 NA

Re: Topband: 160M Conditions - CQWW

2023-01-28 Thread Charles Morrison
If some and some dont, you still get out of area callers.. On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 2:44 PM Mike Waters wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2023, 1:38 PM Charles Morrison < > charles.morrison.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Many poor operators in Europe do not respect an area CQ, especially on CW. >> On SSB

Re: Topband: 160M Conditions - CQWW

2023-01-28 Thread Charles Morrison
Many poor operators in Europe do not respect an area CQ, especially on CW. On SSB Many poor operators in Europe wont even respect a DX station when he calls for a specific prefix or suffix, why would they respect an area CQ ? On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 2:21 PM Mike Waters wrote: > On Sat, Jan

Re: Topband: 160M Conditions - CQWW

2023-01-28 Thread Mike Waters
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023, 11:59 AM Roger Kennedy wrote: > ... However, I never call CQ in these contests, as I don't want to waste > time > getting called by dozens of EU stations! > What's wrong with calling CQ [AREA]? e.g. CQ DX CQ NA CQ SA CQ ... And if you get called by a EU, just ignore it.

Re: Topband: 160M Conditions - CQWW

2023-01-28 Thread Mike Waters
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023, 1:38 PM Charles Morrison < charles.morrison.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > Many poor operators in Europe do not respect an area CQ, especially on CW. > On SSB Many poor operators in Europe wont even respect a DX station when > he calls for a specific prefix or suffix, why would