Re: Topband: electrical wavelength

2012-09-10 Thread HAROLD SMITH JR
Hello Bob, I have used the published velocity factors for years. I made a 4:1 balan for my Telrex 20M546 a few years ago with RG14 coax. After I cut it, I checked it with my GDO and all was fine. 73  Price W0RI Hi it's still flooded here but I wanted to fire up one of my verticals by

Re: Topband: electrical wavelength

2012-09-10 Thread Jim Hoge
Let's do some quick math 234/1.82=128.57 gives us the length in feet of a quarter wave at 1.820 mHz. Multiply that by a velocity factor ( say 85% for LMR-400) and you get a length of 109.29 feet. The math will tell you that for every percentage point of velocity factor, it equates to 1.28

Re: Topband: electrical wavelength

2012-09-10 Thread Jim Brown
On 9/10/2012 9:23 AM, Jim Hoge wrote: Let's do some quick math 234/1.82=128.57 gives us the length in feet of a quarter wave at 1.820 mHz. Multiply that by a velocity factor ( say 85% for LMR-400) and you get a length of 109.29 feet. That math is a bit too simple, because Vf VARIES as

Re: Topband: electrical wavelength

2012-09-10 Thread Tom W8JI
Let's do some quick math 234/1.82=128.57 gives us the length in feet of a quarter wave at 1.820 mHz. That's not correct. The number is 245.8926/F, which is rounded to 246/F. A quarter wave in freespace is 245.8926/1.82 = ~135.1 feet, not 128.57 234/F is a long way off.

Re: Topband: electrical wavelength

2012-09-10 Thread Jim Hoge
My apologies to the group. I stand corrected. My incorrect constant and overly simplified math clouded the point I was trying to make. The point was intended to be that at top band frequencies, each degree of electrical phase winds up being a little over a foot in length. With relatively

Re: Topband: electrical wavelength

2012-09-10 Thread Jim Brown
On 9/10/2012 10:44 AM, Tom W8JI wrote: I firmly do not believe that is true. Velocity factor in cable is the square root of the inverse of dielectric constant. Tom, Respectfully, I suggest that you go back to your college textbook on the fundamentals of Transmission Lines. The equations

Re: Topband: electrical wavelength

2012-09-10 Thread Pete Smith N4ZR
I thought we were talking about RF. 73, Pete N4ZR The World Contest Station Database, at www.conteststations.com The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com, spots at telnet.reversebeacon.net, port 7000 and arcluster.reversebeacon.net, port 7000

Re: Topband: electrical wavelength

2012-09-10 Thread Tom W8JI
Likewise, Zo is only sqrt (L/C) at VHF. The more complete equation is sqrt [ (R+J omega L) /( G + J omega C) ] At VHF, the equation SIMPLIFIES to sqrt (L/C) At low audio frequencies, and up to VHF, G is insignificant (leakage) so the complete practical equation is sqrt [(R+ j omega L) / j

Topband: NH8S on Topband

2012-09-10 Thread Herb Schoenbohm
Just spoke to the 10 meter NH8S operator and he told me that as soon as the sun goes down they will be on TB till the sun comes up. He said everything is in place and tested and they will definitely be on solid tonight. Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ ___

Re: Topband: NH8S on Topband

2012-09-10 Thread Bob K6UJ
wow, I had better get my ### in gear and finish getting my inverted L back up. thanks Herb, Bob K6UJ On Sep 10, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Herb Schoenbohm wrote: Just spoke to the 10 meter NH8S operator and he told me that as soon as the sun goes down they will be on TB till the sun comes up. He

Re: Topband: electrical wavelength

2012-09-10 Thread DAVID CUTHBERT
Run the numbers and for RG-6 we see that sq root of L/C is good above a couple hundred kHz. Dave WX7G On Sep 10, 2012 2:37 PM, Jim Brown j...@audiosystemsgroup.com wrote: On 9/10/2012 10:44 AM, Tom W8JI wrote: I firmly do not believe that is true. Velocity factor in cable is the square

Re: Topband: electrical wavelength

2012-09-10 Thread Rik van Riel
On 09/10/2012 07:42 PM, DAVID CUTHBERT wrote: Run the numbers and for RG-6 we see that sq root of L/C is good above a couple hundred kHz. Does that have any consequences when planning phasing lines for a receive 4-square that is to be used on eg. 137 kHz? Are there types of coax that are more

Re: Topband: electrical wavelength

2012-09-10 Thread Tom W8JI
Run the numbers and for RG-6 we see that sq root of L/C is good above a couple hundred kHz. Dave WX7G I just ran it in MathCAD and it showed a Zo and Vf slope starting down around 150 kHz, but I assumed the conductors were solid copper. Conductors have to be in the thousands of a inch range

Re: Topband: NH8S on Topband

2012-09-10 Thread John Morris
Bob, don't worry about the inv-l. From where you are, a loaded window screen should work just fine. Good luck/73, John, W4GD -Original Message- From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bob K6UJ Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 7:08 PM To: Topband Subject: Re:

Re: Topband: NH8S on Topband

2012-09-10 Thread Bob K6UJ
hihihi ! Bob K6UJ On Sep 10, 2012, at 7:06 PM, John Morris wrote: Bob, don't worry about the inv-l. From where you are, a loaded window screen should work just fine. Good luck/73, John, W4GD -Original Message- From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On

Re: Topband: electrical wavelength

2012-09-10 Thread Wes Attaway (N5WA)
Tom I think everything is real quiet while a bunch of folks are busy looking at manuals and crunching numbers with their analyzers. Someone wants to find a mistake in your opinion. Stand by. - Wes Attaway (N5WA) --- 1138 Waters Edge Circle, Shreveport, LA