I am building a 90 ft, 80m rotatable dipole. I am near the point of fabricating
the inductors/coils that will go about 23 ft out on the element. I am guying
the element just before the inductor. I have several questions:
1. Does the size of the gap between the center element and element tip make
RF measured two different batches of the Plastic covered WD-1A
wire. One was 130 ohms and the other was 150 ohms.
Lot of hams use it for two wire beverages with good luck.
1. Remember postings saying Beverage wire size could be very small
if it could be physically supported. This
I disagree.
The inverted Vee, specifically, transmits vertically polarized
RF and has about the same gain as a 1/8 wave tee top ground plane
vertical, if EZNEC is to be believed. Inverted Vees can also be
arranged in arrays. They are useful DX antennas; I got a 559 signal
report from a Dutch
Well said, Guy! I should post this alongside W8JI's quotes and ON4UN's
charts on http://www.w0btu.com/160_meters.html . :-)
160 is on the vertical polarization side of a dotted line somewhere between
> 160 and 80 meters where there is some poorly defined and poorly understood
> modal shift,
Yeah, I could believe that. On 80 meters I could believe that.
N4AF/NY4A had a fixed Northeast 80m 4 element wire vee yagi off two towers
and a 220 foot catenary suspended between. Apex of the vee's 100-120 feet.
It was a killer antenna. But it was also on the horizontally polarized side
of the
Hi Gary,
Thanks. This must be it. Hope it helps the OP.
win.i1wqrlinkradio.com/archive/OH2BEN_Reversible_
Beverage_Array-20-10-2007_04d.pdf
73, Mike
www.w0btu.com
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 5:03 PM, kd9sv wrote:
> Mike, do a search for "Killu" wire from Finland...the author
Sorry, that's not the correct thread. I'll have to find it later.
It had to do with with a ham in Finland (?) who actually did some
measurements and may have posted them online.
73, Mike
www.w0btu.com
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Mike Waters wrote:
> Here is a thread
Here is a thread from 7/23/12 that may answer this question. This URL is
only one post in the thread. Follow it down from there.
lists.contesting.com/pipermail/topband/2012-July/038223.html
73, Mike
www.w0btu.com
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 1:24 PM, HAROLD SMITH JR
wrote:
>
The T31T 12 meter ssb op announced at 2145z today that they "may" be on 160
tonight.
Mike W2LO
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Hi Guy
Thanks for your detailed reply. I am building a two-phase vertical for 80
meters, 1/4wave separated. Untill now I usee 1 single vertical with around
50 or 60 radials and I have noticed that towards East the dipole works way
better than the Vertical (maybe because towards NA I have a down
But believe the WD1A really works well at this QTH in both forward and
reverse modes. I have made many direct comparisons on extreme DX on 160
and the WD1A was the difference it too to hear the weak signal. My
tests on the VK0 and VP8 Dx-peditions with a 600 foot single wire
Beverage and the
Hi Herb and all,
When I was in the Army, 1958 to 1960,, I was a "Field Communications Crewman".
It meant, I helped string telephone wire.
We used what was called WD-1TT. It was two separate conductors. They were
twisted, not molded together. Each conductor was made of 3 steel wires and 4
If that were not enough, W8JI famously had a 160 dipole up 270 feet doing
A/B tests vs. his verticals, this for over a year I think. In the end, he
heard better signals on the dipole just a handful of times. Most of the
time the verticals were significantly better.
160 is on the vertical
Thanks for all of your input. I have been reading this forum for many, many
years but this was the first time I called upon the collective wisdom of the
group. Your responses were greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Jim
W2SM
_
Topband Reflector Archives -
Herb,
Is that impedance for audio or RF frequencies? The best this is to use a RF
bridge or analyzer to determine the impedance at the frequency of interest,
which is 1.8Mhz in our case.
Mike N2MS
- Original Message -
From: Herbert Schoenbohm
To:
- Forwarded Message -
From: Herbert Schoenbohm
To: topband@contesting.com
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: Topband: WD-1 Wire impedance
Some discussion of WD-1A on Google claims the impedance is 170 ohms and
other claim 70
Some discussion of WD-1A on Google claims the impedance is 170 ohms and
other claim 70 ohms. I have 1/2 mile on a spool that I will measure
with a bridge and several resistors to see what is the nearest.
On 10/10/2016 12:38 PM, Herbert Schoenbohm wrote:
The impedance of WD-1A is supposed to
I use a DXE reversible beverage system using 450 ohm ladder line which runs
along a fence line between a few friendly neighbors. However, a couple have
commented that “that big wire really sticks out, especially in the winter,” so
I am looking to replace the ladder line with something less
Probably not worth the effort as any dipoles less than 250 feet high are
serious cloud warmers.
On 10/10/2016 9:21 AM, Filipe Lopes wrote:
Hi guys
We are rebuilding our station and I was thinking about putting up 2 dipoles
1/8 wavelength apart.
Has anyone ever tried to phase them for
I agree. Even a simple helix or slinky on a 30 foot fiberglass pole
with a 3/4 in 10 foot aluminum extension and some 3 foot whiskers on top
of that against a ground of a few radials would keep you in the
ballgame. It could be all self supporting and withstand a 60 mph wind.
Herb, KV4FZ
Hi guys
We are rebuilding our station and I was thinking about putting up 2 dipoles
1/8 wavelength apart.
Has anyone ever tried to phase them for example with Christman method?
Thanks
Filipe Lopes CT1ILT aka CR6K
Sent from my Huawei Mate 8
_
Topband Reflector Archives -
hello
Many will remember and will have been pleased to work 4V1TL last January.
Well, unfortunately this could not happen anymore in a short time,
Everything is on the floor. This was made possible by the work of some
people that unconditional invested and donate a lot of money and radio
stuff to
22 matches
Mail list logo