Well said! I have *never* seen a better source of relevant information.
Period!
73, Mike
www.w0btu.com
On Feb 17, 2017 7:01 PM, "Goldtr8 (KD8NNU)" wrote:
Read the information in the links from Jim Brown. Once you understand what
he is explaining, it becomes easier to
What Frank says (below) is 100% correct. There is simply no substitute for
time in the chair. I never use any propagation prediction methods. I know
from more than three decades of lowband DXing and contesting experience when
the openings are most likely to occur but I can't predict them in
Read the information in the links from Jim Brown. Once you understand what
he is explaining, it becomes easier to fix.
http://audiosystemsgroup.com/RFI-Ham.pdf
http://audiosystemsgroup.com/NCDXACoaxChokesPPT.pdf
~73
Don
KD8NNU
2014 3905CC Top Gun :-)
-.- -.. ---.. -. -. ..-
-Original
<<
True grey line radio wave propagation rarely occurs on 160 meters and true
long path propagation even less. When it does the opening is usually only a
few minutes long. Instead it's usually a skewed path that includes RF signal
ducting in the E Valley/F layer propagation region.
I'm
What is the rf grounding system for the antenna? If it's adequate then there
shouldn't be any rf on the outside of the coax. If it isn't then you're
bringing part of the antenna into the shack. Ferrites are a band-aid in this case.
Wes N7WS
On 2/17/2017 12:40 PM, Paul Kiesel via Topband
Paul,
Loading the coax with ferrites might make a difference, but I don't think
that's a good way to address the problem. If there's RF in the shack, that
probably means it's being reflected from the antenna. With or without a
ground at the shack, the antenna/load should absorb all the power
Hello -
I'm not able to run more than 150 watts when using JT65 on 160. RF gets into
the computer and disrupts the JT signal. I don't have this problem on 6m where
I run QRO using JT65 on EME. I installed ferrite beads on all radio and
computer leads, with multiple beads on coax cables. My
I also produce a daily HF radio wave propagation forecast on my Facebook
page at https://www.facebook.com/thomasfranklingiellaw4hm
For my hamateur radio and SWL friends around the globe:
Feel free to redistribute this "not for profit" solar, space and geomagnetic
weather discussion and HF
Mirko S57AD, congratulations! I'm much closer to Alaska and I only work
Alaska a couple times a year on 80M.
I have been a ham for 39 years now, but I am a "newbie" to 80M. I never had
an actual 80M antenna until 2008.
The first week I had my 80M antenna up, I didn't "know" that "80M was only
a
True grey line radio wave propagation rarely occurs on 160 meters and true
long path propagation even less. When it does the opening is usually only a
few minutes long. Instead it's usually a skewed path that includes RF signal
ducting in the E Valley/F layer propagation region.
I had a web
Hi,
I sometimes look at the forecasts and space weather info but that is
more often "after action" done in the chair. If we look at that first it
gives a place to start. But I agree the final result comes from the
chair time.
73,
Bill KU8H
On 02/17/2017 10:44 AM, donov...@starpower.net
W6EL prop program helped me to work my first (and single, so far) Alaska on
80m some 20 years ago.
73, Mirko, S57AD
2017-02-17 18:50 GMT+01:00 Merv Schweigert via Topband <
topband@contesting.com>:
> I agree seat time is the only sure way. I have tried a number of
> different prop programs
>
I agree seat time is the only sure way. I have tried a number of
different prop programs
and have not been satisfied so to speak.
What I use now most of the time does not specifically show grey line,
but does do long
and short path, and you can "estimate" grey line by the sunrise /
sunset
Hi Kris,
There's no substitute for butt in chair time if you want to work grey
line long path DX on 80 meters. 160 meters is also possible, but
much more difficult.
Just check your local sunrise/sunset times and the sunrise/sunset
times in your target area and sit your butt in your chair
Hello Kris N5KM,
Thanks for the clarification.
80m is a different story. Yes, we can predict greyline propagation on 80m
(I assume when you say greyline propagation, you mean propagation along the
terminator). And our predictions say there is still significant loss along
and near the terminator
Hi Carl,
Well, I guess I was cheating a bit by posting here. I was hoping the folks
who
dwell here might be more knowledgeable about propagation than other forums.
(You prove my case. Hi.)
I've been concentrating on the lowbands (160m and 80m) so my question really
was concerning 80m greyline
16 matches
Mail list logo