Re: Topband: BOGs, Snakes and snowpack

2015-02-26 Thread Guy Olinger K2AV
The short answer is that a foot of snow on top of it will affect it terribly. The long answer is gawd-awful. Don't ask any more if you don't want to know. 73, Guy On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 6:02 PM, K2RS k2rsonl...@comcast.net wrote: When spring finally arrives, I'd like to try a BOG and/or a

Topband: BOGs, Snakes and snowpack

2015-02-26 Thread K2RS
When spring finally arrives, I'd like to try a BOG and/or a Snake receive antenna. I live on a half-acre suburban lot and these antennas are doable. But I have a question about them. Does a substantial snowpack -- let's say a foot or more -- have an effect on the performace of on-the-ground

Re: Topband: BOGs, Snakes and snowpack

2015-02-26 Thread Mike Waters
Hello Guy, I understand that the dielectric constant of snow is far higher than air. But wouldn't some length of a BOG covered with snow at least hear better than the mag and wire loop that he currently has? 73, Mike www.w0btu.com On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV

Re: Topband: BOGs, Snakes and snowpack

2015-02-26 Thread K1FZ-Bruce
True the lower velocity factor does bring the frequency down lower with snow leaves. In my case found that 215 feet may be best in the dry month in summer, 200 feet is best on 160 meters year around.  I can get 3 S points front to back on my two wire reversible BOG under deep snow, but it is