Isn’t it amazing that unless someone does it just as you did (old tech, no
internet, output power limited by LORAN, etc.) that their achievement doesn’t
quite make the grade? After all, nobody’s seen the trouble I’ve seen, right?
Spend a few quality moments reading On the Origin of Species. Then
Hey don't leave out AM or spark gap!
On 2/12/2020 6:31 PM, Cecil wrote:
Still taking pokes at the FT8 ops.
What would constitute an exceptional achievement on FT8?
That’s like telling CW guys that their achievements aren’t really noteworthy
compared to how the Sideband guys have done it.
-Original Message-
From: Cecil [mailto:chac...@cableone.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2020 8:32 PM
To: Ed Sawyer
Cc: Topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK..
Still taking pokes at the FT8 ops.
What would constitute an exceptional achievement on FT8?
That’s
Still taking pokes at the FT8 ops.
What would constitute an exceptional achievement on FT8?
That’s like telling CW guys that their achievements aren’t really noteworthy
compared to how the Sideband guys have done it.
Cecil
K5DL
Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 12, 2020, at 12:18 PM, Ed Sawyer
You probably think that I am pleased to talk about crooks?
There is an destruction of amateur radio!
And nobody does anything ...
---
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua
Tree писал 2020-02-13 01:49:
All -
Mike is correct - instead of yelling on this channel about possible
cheating -
To be honest I don't think there is a code of ethics anymore at least
not in award chasing in Ham radio.
To give example I recently heard a very prominent operator and Dx'er on
FT8. In three calls from western US this super station gave a middle
eastern station a plus 6 and plus 8 dB S/N
All -
Mike is correct - instead of yelling on this channel about possible
cheating - working with the contest sponsors is the best way to make
something happen.
Sometimes, it will take a little time for something to happen. Patience.
Tree N6TR
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 12:38 PM Mike Smith VE9AA
If UY0ZG believes several of his countrymates are cheating, then he should
seek assistance in gathering evidence and present it to the good folks at
CQ160 (ie: I believe it's currently Andy, N2NT & crew).
Repeatedly screaming "they're cheating! they're cheating" is less than
useful. Nobody is
On 2/12/2020 10:18 AM, Ed Sawyer wrote:
Where else can someone's
concern that "that just doesn't sound/look/smell right" come to?
The CQ Contesting reflector has had some good discussions on this topic,
especially because it includes hams who serve to help administer major
contests. As far
I have to differ somewhat with the comment that Topband Reflector should not
be used to discuss suspect cheating on 160M. Where else can someone's
concern that "that just doesn't sound/look/smell right" come to? Its
possible that others observed the same thing on the band and maybe it
actually
Yes sir could not have said it better. Fred KB4QZH
Original message From: Henk Remijn PA5KT via Topband
Date: 2/11/20 4:26 PM (GMT-05:00) To:
topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. ? I got a lot
of negative private comments on my email.I think
Just use your delete key and move on. Don't let the actions of others
ruin a great resource.
W0MU
On 2/11/2020 3:55 PM, Dan Edward Dba East edwards wrote:
agree, Henk & jim..
unfortunately, trolls are everywhere, now..
regards, w5xz, dan
On Tuesday, February 11, 2020, 04:01:57 PM
agree, Henk & jim..
unfortunately, trolls are everywhere, now..
regards, w5xz, dan
On Tuesday, February 11, 2020, 04:01:57 PM CST, Jim Brown
wrote:
On 2/11/2020 1:26 PM, Henk Remijn PA5KT via Topband wrote:
> I am subscribed to this maillist to learn from others on Topband.
>
> I
On 2/11/2020 1:26 PM, Henk Remijn PA5KT via Topband wrote:
I am subscribed to this maillist to learn from others on Topband.
I would expect subjects like: propagation, antennas, operating practice,
etc.
Not endless mails why Digital is bad, cheating is bad, etc is bad, all
others are bad.
I got a lot of negative private comments on my email.
I think people who subscribe to this maillist are not the people who are
cheating. Maybe I am wrong. I hope not.
I am subscribed to this maillist to learn from others on Topband.
I would expect subjects like: propagation, antennas,
Did anyone else work Em2q recently? I worked them in December and I don’t have
any QSL information can anybody help me
Bob ad6hf
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 11, 2020, at 7:37 AM, uy0zg wrote:
>
> "Everybody knows there are people cheating."
>
> Henk
>
> All essence in the size of a
"Everybody knows there are people cheating."
Henk
All essence in the size of a deceit!
---
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua
Henk Remijn PA5KT via Topband писал 2020-02-11 14:28:
Because we you have sent similars mails already 50 times.
Everybody knows there are people cheating.
Just
Because we you have sent similars mails already 50 times.
Everybody knows there are people cheating.
Just ignore them.
73 Henk PA5KT
Op 11-2-2020 om 13:13 schreef uy0zg:
Why ?
Tu all friends!
---
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua
Henk Remijn PA5KT via Topband писал 2020-02-11 13:47:
Why ?
Tu all friends!
---
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua
Henk Remijn PA5KT via Topband писал 2020-02-11 13:47:
These remarks should go to the contest committee not to this maillist.
73 Henk PA5KT
Op 11-2-2020 om 11:07 schreef uy0zg:
Hi
The people!
It is urgent to change the name of
These remarks should go to the contest committee not to this maillist.
73 Henk PA5KT
Op 11-2-2020 om 11:07 schreef uy0zg:
Hi
The people!
It is urgent to change the name of the contest!
Correct - CQ World Wide WEB-SDR 160-Meter Contest .
US1Q - first in Europe ...
UA7K - third in
Hi
The people!
It is urgent to change the name of the contest!
Correct - CQ World Wide WEB-SDR 160-Meter Contest .
US1Q - first in Europe ...
UA7K - third in Europe...
https://www.cq160.com/raw.htm?mode=cw
Multi-Operator
IG9/S59A...3,004,260 (S51V S52OT S56N S57DX S59A)
21 matches
Mail list logo
