Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

2020-12-02 Thread Artek Manuals
Wes You got that right,you gotta walk a mile in the other guys shoes!! When I lived in New Hampshire working EU on 160 was a walk in the park compared to the kind of propagation we get down here in FL or what the guys out west have to EU ( I did a stint as N7EX for a while in Spokane) ...

Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

2020-12-02 Thread Wes
You left out location, location, location...:-) Wes  N7WS On 12/1/2020 4:21 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote: Hi Nick, I have a limited setup, only an inverted L over an FCP on 160 (not like W3LPL's 160m 4 square cannon). With basically no time to operate, I managed about 60 minutes in three spells

Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

2020-12-02 Thread Jim Brown
Yes. About 7 years ago, I bought a VNWA3E, designed by German EE prof DG8SAQ, built and sold by some hams in the UK. It runs on Tom's firmware and Windoze software, powered via the USB port that feeds data to the computer and controls the unit. It has an excellent TDR function -- you perform a

Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

2020-12-02 Thread donovanf
chael Walker" To: j...@audiosystemsgroup.com Cc: topband@contesting.com Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 11:40:57 AM Subject: Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year Hi Jim My point on feedlines is that you can’t assume all is good. You do need to test and confirm. And chokes are a mu

Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

2020-12-02 Thread Salvatore Borace
Nick UY0ZG not only on East Europe still good user of websdr also here, condition still very bad also here, work only VY2ZM, W3LPL, N0NI, N4XD, VO1HP, KC1XX, K7GM, NR3X, KA1R, K1TTT, only this, also condition poor with Asia, hope better next week end. Rino IK7JTF _ Searchable

Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

2020-12-02 Thread Michael Walker
Hi Jim My point on feedlines is that you can’t assume all is good. You do need to test and confirm. And chokes are a must. Mike va3mw > On Dec 1, 2020, at 3:29 PM, Jim Brown wrote: > > On 12/1/2020 10:00 AM, Michael Walker wrote: >> - How old are your feedlines? Are 100% sure they are

Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

2020-12-02 Thread uy0zg
W3LPL - FROM: "uy0zg" TO: donov...@erols.com CC: topband@contesting.com, "Topband" SENT: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 6:32:05 PM SUBJECT: Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year Hi Frank May I ask how many QSOs with zone 16 did you have on 160 meters in th

Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

2020-12-01 Thread donovanf
: "uy0zg" To: donov...@erols.com Cc: topband@contesting.com, "Topband" Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 6:32:05 PM Subject: Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year Hi Frank May I ask how many QSOs with zone 16 did you have on 160 meters in this CQ WW ? --

Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

2020-12-01 Thread uy0zg
something up by the contest weekend.lifes too short to complain, try some small RX antennas, you may be surprised at the results. -- Original Message -- From: "Bob Kile" To: "Topband" Sent: 12/1/2020 6:58:28 PM Subject: Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year Please

Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

2020-12-01 Thread Jamie WW3S
weekend.lifes too short to complain, try some small RX antennas, you may be surprised at the results. -- Original Message -- From: "Bob Kile" To: "Topband" Sent: 12/1/2020 6:58:28 PM Subject: Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year Please, please, every year t

Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

2020-12-01 Thread Bob Kile
Please, please, every year this so called SDR BS comes up. Maybe in some cases it is true, maybe not. All of the top performing trophy seeking stations must record their contacts during the contest. My feeling is that most of the big guns don't have time to screw around with SDR. It would make

Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

2020-12-01 Thread Guy Olinger K2AV
Hi Nick, I have a limited setup, only an inverted L over an FCP on 160 (not like W3LPL's 160m 4 square cannon). With basically no time to operate, I managed about 60 minutes in three spells on 160m, 45 QSO's, 17 zones, 30 countries, all S I worked EU and AF in zones: 14: 4, 15: 7, 16: 1, 20:1,

Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

2020-12-01 Thread Jim Brown
On 12/1/2020 12:38 PM, donov...@erols.com wrote: Flexible coaxial cable jackets are easily damaged by careless handling, by mice and other vermin, by improper installation on a tower, or by not bonding the coax to the top and bottom of the tower which makes it susceptible to pin hole damage

Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

2020-12-01 Thread donovanf
- Original Message - From: "Jim Brown" To: topband@contesting.com Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 8:29:10 PM Subject: Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year On 12/1/2020 10:00 AM, Michael Walker wrote: > - How old are your feedlines? Are 100% sure they are as good as t

Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

2020-12-01 Thread Jim Brown
On 12/1/2020 10:00 AM, Michael Walker wrote: - How old are your feedlines? Are 100% sure they are as good as the day you installed them? Another urban myth -- coax is degraded only 1) by the intrusion of moisture into the dielectric, which occurs at poorly installed or poorly

Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

2020-12-01 Thread uy0zg
Hi Frank May I ask how many QSOs with zone 16 did you have on 160 meters in this CQ WW ? --- Nick, UY0ZG http://www.topband.in.ua donov...@erols.com писал 2020-12-01 20:20: Of course Lee is absolutely correct. Many 160 DXers who have had difficulty with receiving antennas have given

Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

2020-12-01 Thread donovanf
er 1, 2020 5:40:11 PM Subject: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year Hmmm, Nick, I beg to differ with you. I don’t care about scores or countries, zones worked but I do care about 160 meter receiving antennas. In my opinion your statement is dead wrong. Not looking for a war of words o

Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

2020-12-01 Thread Jeff
I agree with you Lee. My new rotatable flag to me is super compared to my 4' loop on my 1/4 acre city lot. I guess it's all relative to one's situation. Maybe the word Nick is looking for is Magic. There is no Magic antenna that is effective when the band is not open. Jeff Reynolds NE0DX

Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

2020-12-01 Thread Michael Walker
you guys complain a lot. :) Get on the air and work them. If you can't hear them either accept it or do something about it. Sitting on your but won't make it better. Ask yourself, what can I do about it? - How old are your feedlines? Are 100% sure they are as good as the day you

Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

2020-12-01 Thread uy0zg
Hi Lee My English is very weak. I can't argue with you .. 1- I agree that there are very good RX antennas. But I repeat - there are no super RX antennas. 2 - if there is a lot of industrial interference near your QTH, a good RX antenna will not help. 3- Very weeks conditions - a good RX

Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

2020-12-01 Thread Lee STRAHAN
Hmmm, Nick, I beg to differ with you. I don’t care about scores or countries, zones worked but I do care about 160 meter receiving antennas. In my opinion your statement is dead wrong. Not looking for a war of words or any more discussion. I will not respond again about this. Lee K7TJR