Re: Topband: HFTA, Radio Arcala, general comments

2012-10-25 Thread Clive GM3POI
Yes Gary, After blowing then away in a CQ 160m Contest by 1m points I figured it was rather an expensive lesson they learn. I was using my 51ft top loaded vertical and a lot of wire under it. 73 Clive GM3POI -Original Message-- Subject: Re: Topband: HFTA, Radio Arcala, general comments

Re: Topband: HFTA, Radio Arcala, general comments

2012-10-25 Thread Richard Fry
Ward N0AX wrote: ... The electron gyrofrequency (I just *love* saying gyrofrequency, don't you?) in the lower layers ... is much closer to 1.8 MHz and causes the wave coupling to change dramatically in ways that are not well understood. This changes with latitude and time of day (or night).

Re: Topband: HFTA, Radio Arcala, general comments

2012-10-25 Thread Jan Erik Holm
, After blowing then away in a CQ 160m Contest by 1m points I figured it was rather an expensive lesson they learn. I was using my 51ft top loaded vertical and a lot of wire under it. 73 Clive GM3POI -Original Message-- Subject: Re: Topband: HFTA, Radio Arcala, general comments As I recall

Topband: HFTA, Radio Arcala, general comments

2012-10-24 Thread k...@frontier.com
My comments follow on three topics that have been brought up,   HFTA - It can import the elevation angle files generated from IONCAP/VOACAP that Dean N6BV produced. HFTA does not have an ionospheric module in it. And yes, the files only go down to 80m because of IONCAP/VOACAP limitations.  

Re: Topband: HFTA, Radio Arcala, general comments

2012-10-24 Thread Mike Waters
How strong of a signal can that enormous Yagi radiate into the USA on 160? I have never heard them. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 7:23 PM, k...@frontier.com k...@frontier.comwrote: Radio Arcala - I have always believed that a horizontal antenna on 160m at very high latitudes

Re: Topband: HFTA, Radio Arcala, general comments

2012-10-24 Thread Tom W8JI
Radio Arcala - I have always believed that a horizontal antenna on 160m at very high latitudes would generally be worse (note that I didn't say always) than a vertical due to the effect of the Earth's magnetic field. How theory translates to the real world is always subject to careful

Re: Topband: HFTA, Radio Arcala, general comments

2012-10-24 Thread Ward Silver
My comments?follow on three topics that have been brought up, ? HFTA - It can import?the elevation angle files generated from IONCAP/VOACAP that Dean N6BV produced. HFTA?does not have an ionospheric module in it. And yes, the files only go down to?80m because of IONCAP/VOACAP limitations. ?

Re: Topband: HFTA, Radio Arcala, general comments

2012-10-24 Thread Gary and Kathleen Pearse
As I recall they never blew up the receiver here, unlike TF4M, GM3POI, and others in that direction from KL7 who were consistently available during times of low absorption over the N Pole. Then again, who knows what antenna array they were using or the ERP when heard. I'd still like to know

Re: Topband: HFTA, Radio Arcala, general comments

2012-10-24 Thread Gary Smith
I was regretful enough after installing a tall tower and using wire antennas. At one point I had a two element wire dipole phased array up at maybe 250-260 feet. When it fell down in an ice storm, I was relieved I didn't have to take it down. I had a 110' Aluminum Heights fold over had a