alexey
yes, i understand the thinking, re JT-9 / JT-65; best QSO you never heard as
W4ZV said...
and, 'if i did not hear it with my ears, it does not exist, I can not work it,
it doesn't count' also..
still, ARRL DXCC desk doesn't care what mode we use, right? sowhat the
heck?
as jim,
greetings
to pass the time through the summer doldrums, I've been playing with weak
signal digi-modes. Near sunrise, am having fair luck to VK, w jt-65...
VK3XQ comes through almost every day..
but, at Eu sunrise, my cq's go un-answered, even with kw power. Is the band
really THAT bad to
There's the band, and then there's folks using the band. Both have to line
up!
Important thing is that it is winter in VK :-). So more likely for VK's to
be on topband than for EU's.
I don't do JT-65 but below I share some of my experience with CW this
summer on 160M:
Just in the past week I
Dan Edward Dba East edwards dan.n.edwa...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
greetings
to pass the time through the summer doldrums, I've been playing with weak
signal digi-modes. Near sunrise, am having fair luck to VK, w jt-65...
VK3XQ comes through almost every day..
but, at Eu sunrise, my cq's go
Hello brethren,
I´m ready to be crucified yet I couldn´t resist asking a question:
What's the value of JT modes qso for a dxer?
IMHO Digimodes undermine the value of low band dxing. I don't arfue over
reliability of the modes and their help in extension of hamradio capabilities
in general yet
On 8/12/2014 8:00 AM, ALEXEY OGORODOV wrote:
What's the value of JT modes qso for a dxer?
There's far more to ham radio than making QSOs on CW (which I have been
doing for 59 years). There's also station and antenna building, learning
new techniques, interfacing computers to rigs, and so on.
