[tbc-users] Re: own functions in spin:rules

2009-03-18 Thread Holger Knublauch
-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:topbraid-composer-users@googlegroups.com ] On Behalf Of Scott Henninger Sent: 17 March 2009 18:30 To: TopBraid Composer Users Subject: [tbc-users] Re: own functions in spin:rules Yes. The way ?this works is that it is applied to all instances of the class

[tbc-users] Re: own functions in spin:rules

2009-03-17 Thread Michel Bohms
Replying myself after reading the manual :) I now first defined a subclass of sp:Functions called sumFunction. Then I defined a spin:constraint for it: Argument sp:arg1 : House Finally I defined a body for it (delete at House...): SELECT SUM(?cost) AS ?totalCost WHERE { arg1

[tbc-users] Re: own functions in spin:rules

2009-03-17 Thread Bohms, H.M. (Michel)
@googlegroups.com [mailto:topbraid-composer-us...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Scott Henninger Sent: 17 March 2009 15:44 To: topbraid-composer-users@googlegroups.com Subject: [tbc-users] Re: own functions in spin:rules It seems that somewhere the function is not getting defined in the right places