FWIW some formats such as JSON (and thus JSON-LD) don't even support
comments. The philosophy behind that is that every piece of information
should become data and not be hidden in a specific serialization.
Holger
On 14/07/2017 5:35, Irene Polikoff wrote:
Yes, I agree with Tim.
If comments
Dear Irene
Under the assumption:
“rdf data is always in an RDF database (accessible by SPARQL) and RDF Documents
are ONLY for semantic exchange between such systems”
I fully agree 100 % with all your statements (and those of your colleagues).
So the issue is about the “assumption”.
I observe
Yes, I agree with Tim.
If comments are about an entire graph/ontology, then use rdfs:comment to record
them and use as the subject of the comment statement an identifier/name of a
model. If comments pertain to a subset of the resources described in a model,
then Identify the subset and
Ok, now we have the "reason" for needing this functionality:
*Michel wrote:*
*" I explain why important: we have this concept modelling ontology (CMO)
supporting different modelling styles (decomposition, qudt2.0 etc.). I
would like to group the mechanisms for the different modelling styles
Michel,
Serializations and deserialization provide a way for data to be translated into
a format that could be used for transmission, interchange, storage in a file
system, etc. with the ability for it to be later reconstructed to create
semantically identical clone of the data.
The goal of
Hi Michel,
First, a bit of clarity seems to be required wrt understanding some basics of
RDF/OWL. RDF/XML, Turtle, etc are encoding graphs, which by-definition have no
order or hierarchy. There is no top, bottom or middle of a graph. Therefore,
ordering is not important in any Turtle and
Hi Michel,
First, a bit of clarity seems to be required wrt understanding some basics of
RDF/OWL. RDF/XML, Turtle, etc are encoding graphs, which by-definition have no
order or hierarchy. There is no top, bottom or middle of a graph. Therefore,
ordering is not important in any Turtle and
Hi Holger, see after >:
On 12/07/2017 21:11, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) wrote:
Sorry bit late reply…
When I save, all comments (edited/added manualy) are gone and order is changed.
(can’t remember I changed a setting for that behaviour, so guess default)
After save (in ttl), order seems:
*
