The following is just my opinion:
RDFS collections have zero semantics, so using them for a purpose like this
sounds like a bad idea. I have never used them in any ontology for any customer.
Calling something an “implicit group” and then trying to use semantics to
define it does not make any se
Hereby also the actual code example for modelling implicit groups of assets.
(via a nested constraint for an individual)
Example: a road crash barrier having associated an implicit group of 300
yellow km-signs.
No complaints from TBC.
Still special way of modelling, comments welcome.
# baseURI
