Thx david, much appreciated
I will experiment both owa owl and cwa shacl variants. Lets see if i can bring
the pattern correctly to shacl first...
The results will indeed help us to decide
Gr michel
Op 13 okt. 2021 15:04 schreef David Price :
Hi Michel,
A final question … Have you run any
Hi Michel,
A final question … Have you run any OWL reasoner over this and produced any
inconsistency e.g. in the case of 301 members of your Container saying only 300
are allowed?
I’m not sure the “semantics” you think exist in this setup are actually there.
Maybe I’m wrong as I’ve not tried
Hi David
Thx for your view.
Personally I think the rdfs containers captures at least some generic
"grouping" semantics.
I would not like to redefine that myself (own group classes, member relations
etc.).
On the other hand we might misuse this way a mechanism meant for explicit
grouping for
