All clear thx!
From: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com On
Behalf Of Holger Knublauch
Sent: woensdag 25 oktober 2023 15:08
To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] sh:targetSubjectsOf question
For this design pattern, the paths will likely be the same, but don't have to.
For this design pattern, the paths will likely be the same, but don't have to.
If you delete the target, the shape will apply to nothing.
Holger
> On 25 Oct 2023, at 11:48 am, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users
> wrote:
>
> Is a sh:path for a s:targetSubjectsOf not redundant?
>
Is a sh:path for a s:targetSubjectsOf not redundant?
Like in:
https://otl.waternet.nl/def/9962886e-9ab8-4a31-8286-38925258cb17-Shape
ash:NodeShape ;
sh:property [ sh:datatype xsd:string ;
sh:path
