ons.html
>
> and which is arguably easier to use as it doesn't require the extra step
> through a template.
>
> Holger
>
>
>
> On 24/11/2017 5:28, Simon Schlosser wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I am struggling with creating fixes programmatically. All my search
&g
Hi all,
I am struggling with creating fixes programmatically. All my search efforts
did not provide me with any code snippet that would show how to apply them.
My problem: I have a ConstraintViolation object and via getFixes() I get a
Collection. My defined spin:fix in the construct part of the
Hi all,
I use the SPIN API for regularly checking 100k - 300k instances of a
specific class. With this class 20 constraints are associated. I am doing
quite well regarding performance (absolutely more than fast enough),
however I do not understand how the SPINConstraints.check() method does
re
t depends on ?this, and then executes your
> function with ?this unbound. Attached is a version that works for me.
>
> Holger
>
>
> On 5/28/2015 20:28, Simon Schlosser wrote:
>
> Hi Holger,
>
> please find attached a .ttl that can be directly imported into TBC whe
could run within TBC to help further. You have pasted various
> snippets - can you turn them into attachments that I can open with TBC?
>
> Thanks
> Holger
>
>
> On 5/28/2015 8:06, Simon Schlosser wrote:
>
> Hmm.. unfortunately the problem is not really solved! The syste
Business Partner has
no legal form
I have no idea why the second "instance" causes this problem. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Simon
Am Mittwoch, 27. Mai 2015 22:46:58 UTC+2 schrieb Simon Schlosser:
>
> Hi Holger,
>
> danke! You're making a great job!
>
> It seems the pro
here are a few typical problem areas:
>
> - I see that your functions use spin:_arg1 and spin:_this. In order to
> properly turn those into SPARQL strings, make sure that the graph that is
> registered in the functions registry also includes the system ontologies
> SPL, SP and SPIN (e.g. cre
Hi all,
I have a problem with functions in SPIN API. With TBC Free my constraint
which uses a function works as expected, but using the API it provides
wrong results.
The setting:
- There is a business partner instance that has a property legal
form with a legal form as object (such as