Skype: steverayconsulting
From: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
[mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Peter Denno
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 7:21 AM
To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] Re: Trying to import EA UML into TBC - No go
David,
UML
) 587-3780
>
> Cell: (202) 316-6481
>
> Skype: steverayconsulting
>
> [image: 10yr-logo-sm]
>
>
>
> *From:* topbraid-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:
> topbraid-users@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Peter Denno
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 18, 2014 7:21 AM
>
]
On Behalf Of Peter Denno
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 7:21 AM
To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] Re: Trying to import EA UML into TBC - No go
David,
UML tool interoperability can be viewed in terms of "model exchange" or the
more demandin
David,
UML tool interoperability can be viewed in terms of "model exchange" or the
more demanding "diagram exchange." Most UML tools have no problem with
model exchange. I'd be very surprised if I couldn't read the OP's EA XMI
into MagicDraw. Eclipse is an exception -- it doesn't do model exch
Hi Jack,
You’ve bumped into one of the dirty little secrets of the OMG wrt UML - it is
not an interchangeable form of representing knowledge. It seems XMI can be used
in too many ways and UML is too complex a language for most to have implemented
the two properly and get interchange to work in
Jack,
Pretty much every UML tool says that their output is valid according to UML 2
specification. However, the specification is complex and imprecise, so there
are differences between these implementations.
As a result, I don’t believe XMI tool interoperability trully exists. I
remembe
