[topbraid-users] TopQuadrant is Hiring!

rested, we will appreciate you forwarding this e-mail to them. Thanks, Irene Polikoff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to topbrai

Re: [topbraid-users] superclass online

Yes, it is expected. The data displayed is the data available to the tool. What is available is {?r rdfs:subClassOf https://w3id.org/nen2660/def#PhysicalObject} statement and this is what the form in TBC displays. The statement that {https://w3id.org/nen2660/def#PhysicalObject rdfs:label

Re: [topbraid-users] The Manage-Delete and Manage-Clear menu options have disappeared

s, the menu options appear with a new ontology. > Any way to repair the existing one, or should I just recreate it? > > Steve > > > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 1:09 PM Irene Polikoff <mailto:ir...@topquadrant.com>> wrote: > I don’t think it is related to perm

Re: [topbraid-users] The Manage-Delete and Manage-Clear menu options have disappeared

the ontology > > > Steve > > > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:45 PM Irene Polikoff <mailto:ir...@topquadrant.com>> wrote: > If it was a permissions problem, Steve would not be able to see the Manage > tab. > > As David said, all these options are still

Re: [topbraid-users] The Manage-Delete and Manage-Clear menu options have disappeared

If it was a permissions problem, Steve would not be able to see the Manage tab. As David said, all these options are still there. I can’t think of a reason as to why they would not be shown other than someone deactivated them for this asset collection by using Manage>Configure Features.

Re: [topbraid-users] Properties shapes in ReadOnly (instances) and not displayed on classes.

You can select the class, then use Explore -> Find Usages in Other Asset Collections > On Nov 25, 2021, at 7:35 PM, Rob Atkinson wrote: > > but we want to be able to navigate the classes to find the instances -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [topbraid-users] sparql question

Sorry, we can’t really get involved in debugging complex queries. In general, using a filter in these situations should be unnecessary and is an anti-pattern since the query engine needs to pick all triples and then filter. It is much better to use the same variables. The way OPTIONAL and

Re: [topbraid-users] Properties shapes in ReadOnly (instances) and not displayed on classes.

We recommend putting instances into a graph different from an ontology e.g., into a taxonomy, reference dataset, data graph and many other asset collection types available in EDG. If you create instances in an ontology, by default, only label and comment will be editable. This can be changed

Re: [topbraid-users] How to set the display icon for a class?

Hi Tim, Please see https://datashapes.org/propertyroles.html#IconRole This requires 7.1. > On Nov 19, 2021, at 10:53 AM, Tim Smith wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to be able to change the icon for instances (from the purple > diamond) to a custom icon based on class membership - e.g. like

Re: [topbraid-users] TopBraid 7.1 Public Beta Announcement

el-driven > user experience to support a broader array of use cases. > > On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 5:12:13 PM UTC-5 Irene Polikoff wrote: > Hi Tim, > > 7.1 Release separates EDG from TBC. With 7.1: > > TBC users can continue to use TBC for ontology modelin

Re: [topbraid-users] TopBraid 7.1 Public Beta Announcement

Hi Tim, 7.1 Release separates EDG from TBC. With 7.1: TBC users can continue to use TBC for ontology modeling, RDF data and SPARQL query. However, starting with 7.1 TBC will no longer serve as an IDE for EDG 7.1. Thus, EDG is not available. A separate, new IDE for EDG is provided. It is

Re: [topbraid-users] Add metadata to class attribute

omy after I saw your > teaching video about taxonomy. However, my current business problem is > creating instances of these classes and override values. If these > classes/parameters would be all concepts, I would need to create some custom > relationship (e.g. conformsTo) betwe

Re: [topbraid-users] Re: Add metadata to class attribute

I believe when Kai mentioned reification he was referring to using RDF-star reification. > On Nov 1, 2021, at 8:24 PM, robatki...@gmail.com > wrote: > >  > > You might want to consider a canonical model for observations here - its > basically a model for metadata for results of

Re: [topbraid-users] Add metadata to class attribute

Yes, reification would let you cut the number of property shapes to just 22: 20 for the different properties that will hold values of your quantities/measurements plus the two for the title and the unit of measure. However, you would not be able to specify a default value as you would only

Re: [topbraid-users] Validating owl:Classes or sh:NodeShapes

SHACL constraint in the dash: namespace that serves not > as inference but as a constraint > > https://datashapes.org/constraints.html#SymmetricConstraintComponent > <https://datashapes.org/constraints.html#SymmetricConstraintComponent> > I don't like using owl:inverseOf and str

Re: [topbraid-users] Validating owl:Classes or sh:NodeShapes

constraints.html#SymmetricConstraintComponent> > I don't like using owl:inverseOf and strongly discourage its use. > sh:inversePath is sufficient and doesn't require the use of an (OWL) > inference engine. > > Holger > > > >> >> Steve &

Re: [topbraid-users] Validating owl:Classes or sh:NodeShapes

Please see below. > On Oct 22, 2021, at 7:54 PM, Steve Ray wrote: > > I now understand. > > On a related point, is it true that the only owl uses that persist in SHACL > implementations are the two relating to managing graphs: > > owl:imports (if you want to import other graphs), and Yes,

Re: [topbraid-users] owl restrictions for individuals?

The reasoner implements OWL RL profile. > On Oct 18, 2021, at 9:48 AM, Irene Polikoff wrote: > > Irrespective of this, OWL is open world. There are no warnings on max car > finality unless there is an explicit statement that each member is different > from all others. &g

Re: [topbraid-users] owl restrictions for individuals?

Irrespective of this, OWL is open world. There are no warnings on max car finality unless there is an explicit statement that each member is different from all others. Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 18, 2021, at 4:41 AM, David Price wrote: > > Hi Michel, > > Tthe TopBraid rules engine is

Re: [topbraid-users] hiding assets from menus or lists - but giving view permissions

cially for every graph and so we've not > committed to this. > > Cheers > > Simon > > On Thursday, September 23, 2021 at 11:37:05 PM UTC+10 Irene Polikoff wrote: > It sounds like you are wanting to hide Asset Collections, not assets. > > If a user has view privilege

Re: [topbraid-users] malformed shacl

Hi Michel, If you think your problem is due to some issue with prefixes, a quick workaround is to replace the QNames in the query with full URIs in <>. I know that you sent a number of other e-mails to this list about your prefixes problems. I am quite certain that they are not about bugs in

Re: [topbraid-users] define transform rule

I don’t know about red, but you need to associate a rule with a class that has instances, not with a class does not have any. This is what David said - build a rule to process instances of a class that you have. Associating a rule with something that has no data will not do anything. See

Re: [topbraid-users] hiding assets from menus or lists - but giving view permissions

It sounds like you are wanting to hide Asset Collections, not assets. If a user has view privileges for an asset collection, it will appear in the list of collections, quick navigation/hamburger menu, etc. > On Sep 22, 2021, at 11:38 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > >  > I am afraid the short

Re: [topbraid-users] enriching the semantic table

If you need to script a custom importer for EDG, here is the way to do it: https://www.topquadrant.com/project/importing-data-using-active-data-shapes/ https://datashapes.org/active/import.html#spreadsheets Once you script it, you can use it repeatedly. The custom import can become a part of

Re: [topbraid-users] RE: third issue sheet import

, we recommend and made available facilities for scripting a custom import as explained in https://www.datashapes.org/active/import.html#spreadsheets Also see the video https://www.topquadrant.com/project/importing-data-using-active-data-shapes/ > On Sep 16, 2021, at 11:25 AM, Irene Polik

Re: [topbraid-users] RE: third issue sheet import

Yes, index starts with 0 > On Sep 16, 2021, at 10:23 AM, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users > wrote: > >  > More info: > It only goes wrong when the first sheet is empty > If there is data classification is fine. > > > Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms > Scientist Specialist >

Re: [topbraid-users] View Query schemas for use with GraphQL

To get to the integrated GraphiQL query editor, go to your Taxonomy in EDG and then click on Export -> GraphQL Query. > On Aug 30, 2021, at 2:16 AM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > >  > Hi Sanjeev, > > these are GraphQL schemas, and you can use external GraphQL tools to view > them. In

Re: [topbraid-users] Query Error in EDG but not in TBC

Use FILTER NOT EXISTS Correct syntax is in the SPARQL spec e.g., https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#neg-pattern. When in doubt, simply check the spec. As Pat said, TBC (and Jena, I think) support syntax as per the spec as well as certain shortcuts, but SPARQL editor in EDG only supports

Re: [topbraid-users] "Return local results only" option appears to be negated

I tested as well and it is working correctly for me. > On Jul 22, 2021, at 8:00 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > this works for me in local tests, but I may be doing something different. Do > you have any other search filters or columns active? > > Note that the search now

Re: [topbraid-users] linking images

ve plug-in managers and community marketplaces most IDEs and > common platforms come with these days. > > On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 at 17:11, Irene Polikoff <mailto:ir...@topquadrant.com>> wrote: > RDFS and OWL define a few properties that are to be used to describe class

Re: [topbraid-users] linking images

RDFS and OWL define a few properties that are to be used to describe classes and properties e.g., RDFS:subClassOf for classes. These are available in EDG because RDFS/OWL defines this. There are also properties like RDFS:label and comment that are traditionally used in ontologies. They are

Re: [topbraid-users] EDG does not display sh:qualifiedValueShapes properly

To add to what Holger said, this is the reason sh:name exists. If this was the label of the property shape, then there would be no need to define a new property. One could simply use rdfs:label - as Holger’s example shows. Sh:name was created because it is not the label of the resource that is

Re: [topbraid-users] sh:targetClass question

> with the same pattern. However, this example seems to validate just fine, > without hanging. I'm wondering why the same infinite recursion is not > happening. > > Steve > > > > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 3:09 PM Irene Polikoff <mailto:ir...@topquad

Re: [topbraid-users] label position

I will answer this question from two perspectives: 1. Standards 2. TopBraid EDG 1. From the standards perspective, rdfs:isDefinedBy is a utility property that has no standard semantics. It is typically used to connect a resource to its “home” vocabulary (a graph). This is the use case

Re: [topbraid-users] sh:or vs sh:xone

Because you can only have one value for each property, I think the following will work: resnet:CellExpression rdf:type owl:Class ; rdf:type sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:label "CellExpression" ; rdfs:subClassOf owl:Thing ; sh:property [ sh:path resnet:target ; sh:NodeKind

Re: [topbraid-users] sh:targetClass question

h:node traverse the subClassOf hierarchy > of the sh:targetClass values? > > Steve > > > > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 11:47 AM Irene Polikoff <mailto:ir...@topquadrant.com>> wrote: > What behaviour did you expect? > > Since Connectable is just a sha

Re: [topbraid-users] sh:targetClass question

What behaviour did you expect? Since Connectable is just a shape and does not have any instances, then you can’t use it in sh:class. This constraint says that the value must be an instance of Connectable, which will always be wrong. When you say sh:node s223:Connectable, it means that values

Re: [topbraid-users] simple shacl question

You need a target - either explicitly by using one the SHACL target statements or implicitly by saying that it is a class as well as a node shape > On Jun 23, 2021, at 3:27 AM, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users > wrote: > > And then similar question for: > > ex:heightShape >

Re: [topbraid-users] simple shacl question

> > ex:Bridge > a sh:NodeShape, owl:Class ; (or rdfs:Class) > sh:property [ > sh:path ex:height ; > sh:minCount 1 ; > ] ; > sh:property [ > sh:path sml:hasPart ; > sh:minCount 1 ; > sh:maxCount 1 ; > sh:class ex:Deck ; > ] ; > . This is necessary to

[topbraid-users] Sunsetting support for SPIN constraints

egards, Irene Polikoff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion

Re: [topbraid-users] Staying with official SHACL

ing shacl? > Ie if we do not use it...no issue? > Thx > > Op 20 jun. 2021 04:59 schreef Irene Polikoff : > This is very easy to find out. Just go to http://datashapes.org/dash. All > functionality is explained in detail. > >> On Jun 19, 2021, at 5:48 PM, Steve Ray wro

Re: [topbraid-users] Staying with official SHACL

This is very easy to find out. Just go to http://datashapes.org/dash. All functionality is explained in detail. > On Jun 19, 2021, at 5:48 PM, Steve Ray wrote: > > Very cool! With bated breath, I tried it, and nothing blew up! > > It would be good to know at some point what functionality I

Re: [topbraid-users] Reading and mapping JSON files

st > too tight on hours for that. > > You said "This module does not produce the same output as the ConvertXMLToRDF > module, so you would need to change your next steps". Do you have any > documentation or are you willing to share what you mean by "change your nex

Re: [topbraid-users] Reading and mapping JSON files

r SHACL or SWP to do this, just SPARQL Motion, > SPIN Map, and the published modules. Please advise. > > Jack > > On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 at 1:23:43 PM UTC-7 Irene Polikoff wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > The key piece is to have SHACL Shapes that correspond to the structu

Re: [topbraid-users] Proper use of sh:prefixes

> On Jun 1, 2021, at 4:39 AM, Jan Voskuil wrote: > > Hi, > While trying to familiarize myself with sh:values in EDG, I fail to get the > results I think I expect using sh:prefixes. I’ve read the spec and Holger’s > mail dd March 22 2021 on this topic in this forum. > In TopBraid Examples

Re: [topbraid-users] converting excel to rdf - ontology- querying using SPARQL

Logically speaking, you need an ontology before you convert data into triples. Otherwise, the best a software can do is assume that there is a single class and each column is a property with literal values. In other words, no relationships. In any case, have you tried to just open the file in

Re: [topbraid-users] Querying the TCH for the last changed date of a resource

I can explain how the data is stored in more detail: There is a change resource that has the time of a change. rdf:type teamwork:Change ; dcterms:created "2021-05-14T21:56:29.119Z"^^xsd:dateTime ; sioc:has_creator ; Change resource is a subject of added and deleted triples in this

Re: [topbraid-users] Importing external change history

Example of how changes look like is provided at https://doc.topquadrant.com/7.0/teamwork/ Regarding the TriG import option, there are a couple of things to know about it: 1. This import will create either asset collections in EDG (loading data into them) or RDF files in EDG’s workspace 2.

Re: [topbraid-users] retrieving triples in a .txt file

_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail> > Virus-free. www.avast.com > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail> > > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 7:55 PM Irene Polikoff <mailto:ir...@topquad

Re: [topbraid-users] retrieving triples in a .txt file

I think a simpler question is “what does your Turtle file contains that you do not want”. > On May 10, 2021, at 4:52 AM, Monika Yadav wrote: > > I want to export triples from the .ttl file. Actually I have made a ontology > by merging many .ttl file in top braid composer. Now I want to export

Re: [topbraid-users] inheriting dash viewer and other properties from superclass shapes

I don’t quite understand your model, but may be the following will help: 1. If you have a NodeShape that is not a class, but targets a class, it is considered an alternative view for the class members. The default view is always based on what is defined for the class that is also a node shape

Re: [topbraid-users] [topbraid users] SPARQL results export to TTL file not working as expected

The values bound to ?p are blank nodes which are in turn are subjects of triples that form a complex structure - as you see in your RDF snippet. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 29, 2021, at 6:49 AM, Rashmi Burse wrote: > >  > Hi, > > I want to create a subgraph consisting of only the "Disorder

Re: [topbraid-users] Sparql Query

The answer depends on how you are associating properties with classes. There are 3 approaches and they have different semantics and syntax: SHACL :C1 sh:property [ sh:path :hasReaction; sh:hasValue “abscess”]. Or equivalent that is not using a blank node :C1

Re: [topbraid-users] Hiding/deactivating concepts

An obvious solution is to make them a member of a different class e.g., ex:RetiredConcept. And remove the type they had previously. This class should be “stand alone” i.e., not a subclass of skos:Concept. > On Apr 12, 2021, at 11:58 AM, cbur...@healthwise.org > wrote: > > Holger, > > Thanks

Re: [topbraid-users] Regarding mapping using SPIN Map

SPINMap uses certain built in functions to transform data. For example, buildURI will generate a URI by using some strings as input. When using SPINMap there is a source class and a target class. The transformation transforms data about instances of the source class to create instances of the

Re: [topbraid-users] best practise name space in multiple languages?

Yes, exactly. To simplify it even more: There are graphs and they have identity - graph URI. owl:imports statements refer to the graph URIs. A graph contains a set of triple statements about some resources. These resources also have identity - URIs of resources. URIs are formed by combining

Re: [topbraid-users] Creating instances in extension ontologies

Yes, there is a concept of a class which (transitive) instances can be stored in a given type of an asset collection. For Enterprise Asset collection these are instances of Enterprise Asset. So, yes, if you want to capture something in an Enterprise Asset collection it should be an enterprise

Re: [topbraid-users] best practise name space in multiple languages?

e.g., in the SKOS version of FIBO. Should you have a separate graph dedicated to just storing links? This would be something like EDG Crosswalks. > On Apr 6, 2021, at 10:59 AM, David Price wrote: > > > >> On 6 Apr 2021, at 15:22, Irene Polikoff > <mailto:ir...

Re: [topbraid-users] best practise name space in multiple languages?

There is definitely no problems for a resource to be both a class and a shape. In fact, this is very convenient and used by TopBraid by default. In SHACL specification it is discussed as implicit targeting. As far as a resource being both a skos:Concept and a class and/or, potentially even a

Re: [topbraid-users] Removing Inferences from an Asset Collection

Any action on the Transform tab actually changes the graphs - this is why the tab is called Transform. We modified description of this option for 7.0 - making it (hopefully) clearer: Also in 7.0, there is Inferences panel where you can display inferred triples without asserting them

Re: [topbraid-users] Trying to update a graph using an Active Data Shape service

Yes, I agree with Holger. We need to better understand the full workflow you are trying to implement in order to give meaningful advice. Otherwise, we could all waste time going around in circles. If your data is in EDG because you want to make it easy for multiple users to collaborate on

Re: [topbraid-users] EDG: Querying inferred triples via the SPARQL Endpoint

Hi Tim, These are path expressions, not inferences - so they are not materialized. ^edg:activityOf is simply an inverse path - the actual triple is :BusActivity edg:activityOf :BusFunction You can query for these in SPARQL as you would for any triple pattern. Sequential paths can also be

Re: [topbraid-users] Problems defining prefixes in SPARQL-based shapes

a owl:Ontology ; owl:imports ; owl:versionInfo "Created with TopBraid Composer" ; sh:prefixes [sh:declare [ sh:namespace "http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"^^xsd:anyURI ; sh:prefix "owl" ;

Re: [topbraid-users] Splitting exported ttl file into shacl and non-shacl

To add to David’s response: >> Is there a way to export/save the ontology in seperate ttl files There is no Export option that will split your file into an ontology (shapes) file and data file. There are features in TBC that help you to split them, but I don’t think they are available in

Re: [topbraid-users] json-ld question

> On Mar 18, 2021, at 12:28 PM, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users > wrote: > > I was more wondering whether graphql (and graphql schema) could use json-ld > treatment more as first class citizen in some official GraphQL-LD (GraphQL > Schema-LD) instead of just as being a

Re: [topbraid-users] Property Auto-increment

needs to have autoincrementID == 960. Does this makes more sense? > > Kind regards, > Maja > > torsdag 18. mars 2021 kl. 14:47:44 UTC+1 skrev Irene Polikoff: > Yes, a good point David. > > >> On Mar 18, 2021, at 8:56 AM, David Price > > wrote: >> > >

Re: [topbraid-users] Property Auto-increment

Yes, a good point David. > On Mar 18, 2021, at 8:56 AM, David Price wrote: > > > >> On 17 Mar 2021, at 21:56, Irene Polikoff > <mailto:ir...@topquadrant.com>> wrote: >> >> Another approach is to use a property value rule to automatically calculat

Re: [topbraid-users] Status of sh:values

SHACL AF was initially published as the W3C Note. W3C RDF Shapes Working Group (WG) completed its charter in June 2017. SHACL AF was published as a W3C Note because the WG ran out of time to complete it and to take it all the way to Recommendation during the chartered period which is typically

Re: [topbraid-users] Making the LineageGram more generic

Hi Tim, At the moment, this is not supported. The logic for the LineageGram generation is pretty complex and specific. There is no way to configure which properties it will use. We will take you input into account for future releases. > On Mar 12, 2021, at 2:27 PM, Tim Smith wrote: > > Hi,

Re: [topbraid-users] Q: Why does the Assets Hierarchy filter the properties shown?

drop down in the upper right of a form and can switch between views according to the different classes. You can also use a setting option in the form to show the combined view. But I guess the asset hierarchy panel may get confused. > > Thanks, > > Tim > > On Thu, Mar 4,

Re: [topbraid-users] EDG Feature Request: Assets Hierarchy

Try the following: 1. Create an ontology, include the EDG schema you will be configuring e.g., EDG Enterprise Assets 2. Create Node Shapes for each of the classes which instances you want to show in the asset hierarchy in a custom way For example Business Function View1, Business Activity

Re: [topbraid-users] Q: Why does the Assets Hierarchy filter the properties shown?

Works for me in 7.0 May be because of some changes in the models. The property shape needs sh:class constraint to work in this view. If it is embedded in sh:or, it will not work. We have been making some model updates to address this. > On Mar 4, 2021, at 3:20 PM, Tim Smith wrote: > > Hi, >

Re: [topbraid-users] TBC EDG 7.0 vs 6.4: Teamwork Platform Parameters

Hi Tim, These options are still available, but they are no longer set in the UI. They are moved to the setup file used to deploy EDG on the server. It's all described in the upgrade and migration instructions. See https://www.topquadrant.com/release-notes-topbraid-7-0/. In general, EDG from

Re: [topbraid-users] Exporting rich text definitions

have time, we will see if we can improve it for 7.0. Regards, Irene Polikoff > On Mar 2, 2021, at 2:33 PM, Kevin Guest wrote: > > Hello, > > In one of our glossaries we use rich text format to populate definition > fields. Sometimes I need to export a set of definitions,

Re: [topbraid-users] Crosswalk not update after deleting target or source resource

I think this is similar to your previous question. If you delete a resource from an asset collection, statements referring to this resource from another collection still exist. There are several approaches for addressing this issue: 1. Before you delete a resource, you can use Explore-> Find

Re: [topbraid-users] Update local ontology when import ontologies were updated

ontology imported. Now, If I deleted sb1 from the original ontology, > I can see in the tree that sb1 is not available but in the source of the > ontology, sb1 still exists. > > Le jeudi 25 février 2021 à 19:10:00 UTC+1, Irene Polikoff a écrit : > Where did you add sb1 rdfs:subClassOf

Re: [topbraid-users] Update local ontology when import ontologies were updated

Where did you add sb1 rdfs:subClassOf c1 statement? This sounds like you: 1. Created Ont1 and c1 in it 2. Then, added sb1 and sb2 as subclasses of c1. Where and how did you do it: Created sb1 as a subclass of c1 in Ont1? Created sb1 as a subclass of c1 in some other ontologies? Created sb1 in

Re: [topbraid-users] Dynamically create new instances from SPARQL

Please see below > On Feb 12, 2021, at 12:38 PM, Dan Segal wrote: > > Is it possible to dynamically create a new instance based on a query result? Yes, as long as SPARQL Update is turned on for your server. Go to the Server Configuration page in the Admin Console to make sure it is on. By

Re: [topbraid-users] Possible to change the default Search Panel in EDG?

On Saved SPARQL queries: https://doc.topquadrant.com/6.4/editor/#SPARQL_Query_Panel > On Feb 7, 2021, at 6:16 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > > Hi Elvin, > > the Search Panel is hard-coded in React and produces GraphQL queries. And the > filter conditions of the GraphQL service is also

Re: [topbraid-users] Autpopulate values for datatype properties

Edit >> Rules. It requires a little coding but can read adds/deletes In real time >> and set values based on what it sees. These are seen as extensions of the >> EDG app, not part of the ontology, and must be deployed as code by a System >> Admin. >> >> Ch

Re: [topbraid-users] Deactivation and graph imports

> On Feb 2, 2021, at 2:30 PM, cbur...@healthwise.org > wrote: > > I have an EDG Ontology and two Taxonomies. They import one another as shown > here: > > > > Suppose I have defined an OWL object property and a corresponding SHACL > property shape in the ontology, and I wish for the

Re: [topbraid-users] Autpopulate values for datatype properties

If you are already using the URI counter, then the simplest way is to create a property value rule for skos:notation that would infer the value from the URI by taking the local part of the URI. Property value rule values are inferred dynamically without being persisted. They are available for

Re: [topbraid-users] Ontology learning in TBC-ME

ther words, if we can apply some specific algorithms of NLP, text mining, > etc. in automatical/semi-automatical building of the ontological structures, > because their manual development is often very time consuming. > > Best regards, > Martina Husáková > > On Sat,

Re: [topbraid-users] How to convert text to rdf file

converting in the > "Convert text to RDF" module (sml: serialization). Yes, I can add the next > module, e. g. "Export to RDF file" where I can add the name of the resulting > RDF file, but if I run the script, the second module "Convert text to RDF" >

Re: [topbraid-users] Ontology learning in TBC-ME

Not sure what you mean by this. You can create ontologies in TBC, if this is your question. > On Jan 29, 2021, at 1:39 PM, Martina Husáková > wrote: > > > Good afternoon, > > I would like to ask whether it is possible to practise ontology learning in > TBC-ME? > > Thank you a lot for your

Re: [topbraid-users] How to convert text to rdf file

Take a look at Help. This is for the web service interaction. sml:ImportTextFile (sm:Module) Imports a text file into the xsd:string variable sm:outputVariable. sml:sourceFilePath (xsd:string): The path to a text file. The path can be relative to the current script's folder (e.g.,

Re: [topbraid-users] Graph view in TBC-ME

If you switch into the labels mode - Person icon in the header, next to the Home icon > On Jan 18, 2021, at 2:01 PM, Steve Ray wrote: > > I am increasingly using the Graph view to visualize complex instance > topologies, and would really like to have the instance boxes displayed with > their

Re: [topbraid-users] EDG

, for sh:class it would not be an option at >> all. >> > > The simplest approach is to make a superclass of the classes in question. In > EDG you can declare that to be abstract too. > > Cheers, > David > > >> Many thanks >> >> >> O

Re: [topbraid-users] Trying to play nice with SHACL

There is no path in your example that could get from ?this to ?prop. A path specifies predicates. You do not have predicates to specify - you are finding out your predicates in the first WHERE statement. This is why you need to have 2 statements in the WHERE clause and can’t boil them down to a

Re: [topbraid-users] SHACL Targets

Hi Matt, There are pre-defined target types in SHACL. You can not change their behavior. There is also a way to create SPARQL based targets using a SPARQL query. If a query is a pattern that may be re-used in different contexts, you could declare a custom type by parametrizing the query as

[topbraid-users] TopBraid User Group Meeting

nk you to all that have signed up. We look forward to a productive conversation. Regards, Irene Polikoff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from i

Re: [topbraid-users] SHACL function

https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/#NotConstraintComponent However, if this is about values of the same property e.g., ex:feature and you are already using sh:in A, B, C, you do not need any other constraints. Sh:in says that values of ex:feature must be either A, B or C and nothing else. Thus, you

Re: [topbraid-users] Best practices guidance

ntitykind of ForcePerArea". > > So, the advantage of this method is there are fewer subClasses of my > Measurement class that I would have to define. The cost is more > complex property shapes. > > I'm quite interested in your opinion of this. > > > Ste

Re: [topbraid-users] Best practices guidance

I am pretty sure this was a question about the most appropriate SHACL modeling pattern as opposed to OWL vs SHACL. Regarding reasoning, TopBraid users typically use SHACL rules for reasoning. SWRL is pretty obsolete. It will never be a standard and is mainly supported by Protege. I was also

Re: [topbraid-users] Best practices guidance

I do not understand the difference between two options you are outlining. In the second case, how would the constraint look like? The bigger question that would ultimately determine the answer is “what you would like to accomplish by producing this model and what do you expect to see in

Re: [topbraid-users] how best to create/work-with a linkset or tagset of an arbitrary number of relationship predicates between two lists of objects

You can use multiple relationships in a tagset, but a list of relationships is static I.e., the choice of relationships is not dependent on the items you are connecting. As I understand it, you are wanting different relationships depending on the type of items you are connecting. Further, auto

Re: [topbraid-users] EDG: Feature Request - populate Alternative Label when importing a JDBC Schema

Hi Tim, There is a property edg:name which should get populated. > On Oct 9, 2020, at 5:34 PM, Tim Smith wrote: > > Hi, > > I recently imported a modest sized SQL Server Schema. For each database > column, rdfs:label is populated as: > > " (.)" > > While the intent is clear (to

Re: [topbraid-users] How to import a shapesfile A into a shapesfile B

Just as you do with any other RDF file. If you are using TBC, open file B, find A in the Project Explorer view and drag and drop it into Imports view. If you are using EDF, click on asset collection B, go to Settings tab > Includes, select A in the Includes Dialog. > On Sep 30, 2020, at 4:20

[topbraid-users] Announcing Virtual TopBraid EDG User Group Meeting

We are excited to offer a User Group meeting to all existing TopBraid EDG users and prospective users. The virtual meeting will take place on October 1, 2020 at 11:00 EDT - 12:30 EDT. We will discuss the release planning process, have a deep dive into data import options as well as a Q

Re: [topbraid-users] Is imported graph accessible during spreadsheet import?

Imported graphs are available. If connections are not being created, there is something wrong with matching. Does your import create new instances of Table Columns or are you trying to add info to pre-existing columns? Does the Term column contain labels of the glossary terms exactly as they

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >