Re: [topbraid-users] Shacl for disj.unions?

nt of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it > and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the > electronic transmission of messages. > > > > > From: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com On > Behalf Of dprice > Sent: woensdag 26 juni 2019

Re: [topbraid-users] Shacl for disj.unions?

braid-users@googlegroups.com>> On Behalf Of dprice > Sent: woensdag 26 juni 2019 12:54 > To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com> > Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] Shacl for disj.unions? > > > > > On 26 Jun 2019, at 08:40, '

RE: [topbraid-users] Shacl for disj.unions?

r in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages. From: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of dprice Sent: woensdag 26 juni 2019 12:54 To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] Shacl for disj

Re: [topbraid-users] Shacl for disj.unions?

raid-users@googlegroups.com > <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com> <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> On Behalf Of Holger Knublauch > Sent: woensdag 26 juni 2019 00:45 > To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com> > Subje

RE: [topbraid-users] Shacl for disj.unions?

r in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages. From: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of Holger Knublauch Sent: woensdag 26 juni 2019 00:45 To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] Sha

RE: [topbraid-users] Shacl for disj.unions?

Thx I will check! Verzonden van mijn Android-telefoon via TouchDown (www.symantec.com) -Original Message- From: Irene Polikoff [ir...@topquadrant.com] Received: dinsdag, 25 jun. 2019, 22:00 To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com [topbraid-users@googlegroups.com] Subject: Re: [topbraid-users

Re: [topbraid-users] Shacl for disj.unions?

Possibly, which is why I said that the most up to date documentation of what is being converted is in the file itself. It has wl2shacl:owlDisjointWith2NotClass Michel could check its logic to see if it does what he needs. > On Jun 25, 2019, at 3:47 PM, David Price wrote: > > I think Holger

Re: [topbraid-users] Shacl for disj.unions?

I think Holger did do something for disjoint class assertions or maybe it was only for a specific customer? I know he and I worked on it together at some point. Cheers, David > On 25 Jun 2019, at 18:36, Irene Polikoff wrote: > > No, I do not believe so. > > See this >

Re: [topbraid-users] Shacl for disj.unions?

No, I do not believe so. See this http://wiki.topquadrant.com/display/master/Ontology+Utilities#OntologyUtilities-ConvertOWLAxiomstoSHACLConstraints for links to the relevant

[topbraid-users] Shacl for disj.unions?

Verzonden van mijn Android-telefoon via TouchDown (www.symantec.com) -Original Message- Received: dinsdag, 25 jun. 2019, 19:28 Wil tbc generate shacl for owl disjointunions ? Thx michel Verzonden van mijn Android-telefoon via TouchDown (www.symantec.com) This message may contain