ner in which you use
> it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the
> electronic transmission of messages.
>
>
>
> *From:* topbraid-users@googlegroups.com *On
> Behalf Of *David Price
> *Sent:* vrijdag 23 februari 2024 11:10
> *To:* 'Felix Sas
a TopBraid Suite Users
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] linking glossaries to ontologies ( or taxonomies)
Hi Luis,
One note of caution …
A Glossary Term is seldom “the same thing” as an ontology class/property or a
database table/column. Instead, what we typically do is say that a
class/property
Hi Luis,
One note of caution …
A Glossary Term is seldom “the same thing” as an ontology class/property or a
database table/column. Instead, what we typically do is say that a
class/property or table/column “maps to” the term.
Glossary Terms are usually for a less technical audience, are
users@googlegroups.com On
Behalf Of Holger Knublauch
Sent: vrijdag 23 februari 2024 10:08
To: 'Richard Nagelmaeker' via TopBraid Suite Users
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] linking glossaries to ontologies ( or taxonomies)
Hi Luis,
any asset collection can use assets/resources from other as
Hi Luis,
any asset collection can use assets/resources from other asset collections.
Just owl:import the Glossary (from Settings > Includes). Then, to link a class
with a glossary term, navigate to the definition of rdfs:Class or owl:Class and
add a property/relationship there, with Glossary
Hi guys,
I wonder if there is a way to link glossaries to ontologies.
I mean, let's say I have a group of geographical terms in a list, that I
create as glossary, and then I would like to use this glossary definition
to fill the skos:definition of the corresponding class (concept) in my
