To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] owl no longer supported?
What is no longer supported is the OWL+XML format. OWL in any of the RDF
serializations is supported. If this is in RDF/XML then just rename the file
extension to file.rdf instead of file.owl.
Not associated
What is no longer supported is the OWL+XML format. OWL in any of the RDF
serializations is supported. If this is in RDF/XML then just rename the
file extension to file.rdf instead of file.owl.
Not associated with TopBraid in anyway just a pleased user.
Regards,
Jerven
On 11/15/2018 04:31 PM,
OWL is the non-RDF, XML-based encoding syntax for ontologies. TopBraid has
never supported that.
If your file is xxx.owl but is an RDF/OWL ontology encoded as RDF/XML, then
just rename it to xxx.rdf and it’ll load. If it is the OWL XML encoding, then
you’ll need to get it re-encoded (e.g into
Hi I am getting an error msg saying that OWL files are no longer suppported
by TBC? why? has OWL been removed from the semantic web stack of tech? if
not supported then what should I use in order to convert an OWL file? Dont
say protege please because this is avery large file.
--
You
Hi,
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-JSSyCRCrXbI/U_s2lUNIFDI/A4Q/dB7ElXBZ-zM/s1600/Unbenannt.PNG
so my question is: why? We got RDFS and OWL ontologies and want to use .owl
or .rdf to make clear which type of ontology a file contains.
Regarding the W3C recommendation
