1) Do we have any requirements to release an 0.2.4.1-alpha at any
particular date? I haven't been following e.g. the latest SponsorG
timelines.
2) Nick was enthusiastic about an 0.2.2.38 with the latest fix. Nick,
do you still think that's important? My sense is that it's a totally
esoteric
Hey Zack,
I have pushed the working version of http_apache_steg_t. On server side
it asks apache for the load, on the client side it uses the url
dictionary and parameter values.
http_apache_steg_t is inherited from http_steg_t. But because of all
those macro hackish tricks (which expect you to
On 7/12/12 3:12 PM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
here are the first five metrics tech reports that I'd like to turn into
Tor tech reports (see #5405 for the idea behind this).
The next batch of ten Tor Tech Reports is now available (all in the list
except for the five from 2011 which I posted here a
I have been running private bridges for my VIP contacts for a long time.
I use PublishServerDescriptor 0 to keep my bridges private.
Is it possible to also run a private Exit node?
What would happen, if I hard coded an exit into my torrc that is not
published (if possible at all)?
All the best,
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 12:22:16PM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
Feedback much appreciated!
The pdf documents look really good now. I don't know if the tech reports get
cited a lot but it might be worth adding BibTeX entries next to the pdf download
links.
Also, in order to give the page more
Fixed in a gentoo bug report:
https://422645.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=320722
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
Thus spake Karsten Loesing (kars...@torproject.org):
On 7/12/12 3:12 PM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
here are the first five metrics tech reports that I'd like to turn into
Tor tech reports (see #5405 for the idea behind this).
The next batch of ten Tor Tech Reports is now available (all in
On 8/8/12, SiNA Rabbani s...@redteam.io wrote:
I have been running private bridges for my VIP contacts for a long time.
I use PublishServerDescriptor 0 to keep my bridges private.
Is it possible to also run a private Exit node?
Yes, but (a) anyone who notices that it exists can use it, and
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu wrote:
1) Do we have any requirements to release an 0.2.4.1-alpha at any
particular date? I haven't been following e.g. the latest SponsorG
timelines.
2) Nick was enthusiastic about an 0.2.2.38 with the latest fix. Nick,
do you
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Jordi Espasa Clofent
jespa...@minibofh.org wrote:
On 08/06/2012 07:03 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
Hm. Tor itself doesn't have a tcmalloc compilation option, so whatever
it's doing is something freebsd added. To debug this kind of thing,
what I usually suggest
On 8/8/12 8:38 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu wrote:
1) Do we have any requirements to release an 0.2.4.1-alpha at any
particular date? I haven't been following e.g. the latest SponsorG
timelines.
Yes, we should have tested packages by
Hi Philipp,
On 8/8/12 7:03 PM, Philipp Winter wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 12:22:16PM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
Feedback much appreciated!
The pdf documents look really good now. I don't know if the tech reports get
cited a lot but it might be worth adding BibTeX entries next to the
What line does the build process use when linking Tor?
Hi again Nick,
I have no idea, but I guess I could do the next:
1. Stop the tor service
2. deinstall the present port
3. Check the tcmalloc option is enabled
4. install the port and redirect all the output to a log file
$
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Jordi Espasa Clofent
jespa...@minibofh.org wrote:
What line does the build process use when linking Tor?
Hi again Nick,
I have no idea, but I guess I could do the next:
1. Stop the tor service
2. deinstall the present port
3. Check the tcmalloc option is
On 8/8/12, Nick Mathewson ni...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Jordi Espasa Clofent
jespa...@minibofh.org wrote:
What line does the build process use when linking Tor?
Hi again Nick,
I have no idea, but I guess I could do the next:
1. Stop the tor service
2.
Hi, all!
Michael Backes, Aniket Kate, and Esfandiar Mohammadi have a paper in
submission called, An Efficient Key-Exchange for Onion Routing.
It's meant to be more CPU-efficient than the proposed ntor
handshake. With permission from Esfandiar, I'm sending a link to the
paper here for discussion.
Here is the log:
=== Installing for tor-0.2.2.37
=== tor-0.2.2.37 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.7 - found
=== tor-0.2.2.37 depends on shared library: event-2.0 - found
=== tor-0.2.2.37 depends on shared library: tcmalloc - found
=== Generating temporary packing list
===
Remove (or move) the port's ‘work’ directory and run ‘make’.
(You can't easily *install* an upgraded or recompiled FreeBSD port or
package without removing the old one, though.)
That's possible yes. Or you can use -f flag with portupgrade.
However this is not the point.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Jordi Espasa Clofent
jespa...@minibofh.org wrote:
Here is the log:
=== Installing for tor-0.2.2.37
=== tor-0.2.2.37 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.7 - found
=== tor-0.2.2.37 depends on shared library: event-2.0 - found
=== tor-0.2.2.37
On 8/8/12, Nick Mathewson ni...@freehaven.net wrote:
Michael Backes, Aniket Kate, and Esfandiar Mohammadi have a paper in
submission called, An Efficient Key-Exchange for Onion Routing.
It's meant to be more CPU-efficient than the proposed ntor
handshake. With permission from Esfandiar, I'm
Hello Developers,
My testing shows that you can setup encrypted virtual machines in a
country with easy access to broadband, and have someone from a country
where good computer hardware is hard to find, the Internet got cut off
to a point where only dial up is available, and manage to give
21 matches
Mail list logo
