Matt Pagan transcribed 2.6K bytes:
>
>
> >>
> >> COMMANDs: (combine COMMANDs to specify multiple options simultaneously)
> >> get bridgesRequest vanilla bridges.
> >> get transport [TYPE] Request a Pluggable Transport by TYPE.
> >> get help Displays this message.
On 7/23/2014 10:57 AM, Matt Pagan wrote:
>
>>> COMMANDs: (combine COMMANDs to specify multiple options simultaneously)
>>> get bridgesRequest vanilla bridges.
>>> get transport [TYPE] Request a Pluggable Transport by TYPE.
>>> get help Displays this message.
>>>
El mié, 23-07-2014 a las 18:34 -0400, Roger Dingledine escribió:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:24:47PM +0100, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
> > What would happen if a Tor node changes behaviour and uses four or five
> > relay steps instead of three?
> >
> > Would it enhance Tor's security?
>
> I as
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:24:47PM +0100, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
> What would happen if a Tor node changes behaviour and uses four or five
> relay steps instead of three?
>
> Would it enhance Tor's security?
I assume you mean a Tor client?
https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq#ChoosePathLeng
Noel David Torres Taño:
> Hi all
>
> What would happen if a Tor node changes behaviour and uses four or five
> relay steps instead of three?
>
Hi Noel,
Does https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq#ChoosePathLength answer your
question?
Matt
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi all
What would happen if a Tor node changes behaviour and uses four or five
relay steps instead of three?
Would it enhance Tor's security?
Is it possible to relay Tor through a Tor connection? I mean using Tor
with its three steps to reach a Tor entry node to get three extra steps.
Would tha
>>
>> COMMANDs: (combine COMMANDs to specify multiple options simultaneously)
>> get bridgesRequest vanilla bridges.
>> get transport [TYPE] Request a Pluggable Transport by TYPE.
>> get help Displays this message.
>> get keyGet a copy of Bridge
>
> (Aside: I think this thread is unrelated enough to tor-dev at this point
> that I'm going to make this my last reply.)
>
That's too bad - I was only answering questions you posed yourself. Happy
to continue debating off list. Still, I think discussion of features that
could increase usage are
