Mashael, Ian -- this looks awesome, congrats!
A couple of very minor comments come to mind (mainly from looking at Figure
5):
a) For AS-level adversaries, the following could be useful inclusions:
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1029199
Dear Ian,
Thanks for publishing this! I am now a huge fan of your work... This
is excellent!
Cheers,
David
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Paul Syverson
paul.syver...@nrl.navy.mil wrote:
Only glanced through it, but it looks amazingly comprehensive for a 32
page paper (plus references). I
Thanks to both of you! Mashael deserves the bulk of the kudos, of
course. ;-)
- Ian
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 05:54:39PM +, David Stainton wrote:
Dear Ian,
Thanks for publishing this! I am now a huge fan of your work... This
is excellent!
Cheers,
David
On Fri, Mar 13,
Prateek Mittal:
Mashael, Ian -- this looks awesome, congrats!
A couple of very minor comments come to mind (mainly from looking at Figure
5):
a) For AS-level adversaries, the following could be useful inclusions:
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1029199
I am really looking forward to reading this over the weeked!
Thanks!
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Ian Goldberg i...@cs.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
As I mentioned at the dev meeting, Mashael and I were just finishing up
a survey paper on Tor performance and security research.
The tech report
Mike Perry mikepe...@torproject.org writes:
Conversational confusion aside, one of my pet peeves is being unable to
search the web for a piece of software by name only and find it on the
first page.
+1
Also I think to be *completely* modern, you have to make sure the .io
domain still exists
Not to be a downer, but I'm not sure a common name like Seth really
solves the problem here. I can already foresee:
new_person: New relay operator here, any tips?
somebody: Hey, try Seth!
new_person: The EFF technologist who posts on tor-talk?
new_person: Does he help with relay admin
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:36 +, Damian Johnson wrote:
...
And on a side note, damn naming things is hard...
Indeed. You mostly need invented names to avoid the google trap,
like git didn't, and thalys did.
'sethor' came to mind, and it contains 'tor' in a non-roger-invoking
way. :-) (But
As I mentioned at the dev meeting, Mashael and I were just finishing up
a survey paper on Tor performance and security research.
The tech report version was just posted on eprint:
https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/235
for your perusing pleasure. ;-)
Thanks,
- Ian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03/15 17:08, A. Johnson wrote:
Looking forward, hidden-service statistics are now available on
Metrics:
https://metrics.torproject.org/hidserv-data.html
Looks great!
- Total hidden-service traffic in Mbit/s (per day, using
weighted
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03/15 21:26, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 06:01:13PM +, George Kadianakis wrote:
Karsten Loesing kars...@torproject.org writes:
The question is, what graphs do we want on Metrics? How
about:
- Total hidden-service
Hi everyone,
Argos: the name of the 100-eyed giant in Greek mythology.
It fits, if my opinion were to be welcome.
And it doesn't clash with the Argus programming language.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argus_Panoptes
Lluís
Andreas Krey:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:36 +, Damian Johnson
Hi everyone,
Argos: the name of the 100-eyed giant in Greek mythology.
It fits, if my opinion were to be welcome.
And it doesn't clash with the Argus programming language.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argus_Panoptes
Hi Lluís. Last night I sunk a couple hours into looking for
alternative
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03/15 19:01, George Kadianakis wrote:
Karsten Loesing kars...@torproject.org writes:
Also note that more is not necessarily better. All graphs we put
on Metrics should be easy to comprehend for non-researchers and
non-developers. If
This is a great discussion, thanks Mike for writing down TBB release
process.
I think is very important to start being more strategical on how we plan
the different projects releases. Of course this doesn't mean we have to
force a big change right away, that is why the discussion is important
so
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Mike Perry mikepe...@torproject.org wrote:
As fair warning, I am very likely to decide that it will be better to
ship 0.2.7.x in TBB 5.0-stable on Aug 11th, as I suspect that the risk
from things like PT compatibility and control port compatibility issues
Only glanced through it, but it looks amazingly comprehensive for a 32
page paper (plus references). I haven't read it yet, but a glance
suggests it could be a go-to reference to give to people wanting to
get up to speed on Tor and its current research questions. Congrats!
aloha,
Paul
On Fri,
17 matches
Mail list logo
