On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 10:20:50 -0700
Cory Pruce wrote:
> Dude, thanks a bunch for you help. I'm really excited to start :D I'm
> going to read through the initial design and the code to see what
> functions/structures/constants/etc. need to be changed. Let me know
> when you release #14175 and I'll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>
> Well, your ideal scenario is a separate box / VM, with at least 2
separate cores, for each of the tor instances you're pushing data
through (2-3 with a path length of 1, 4-5 with a path length of 3, as
you'll need to account for cannibalization).
> On 6 Jul 2015, at 04:36 , Cory Pruce wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes, and testing locally gives you much better control of all the
> factors which affect performance.
> >
>
> Can I set everything up using vm's or maybe just a single relay?
Well, your ideal scenario is a separate box / VM, with at least
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>
> Yes, and testing locally gives you much better control of all the
factors which affect performance.
>
Can I set everything up using vm's or maybe just a single relay?
>
> Yeah, that was 8 optimistic, uninterrupted hours. Otherwise known as
"fa
> On 6 Jul 2015, at 03:20 , Cory Pruce wrote:
>
> On 07/04/2015 06:19 PM, teor wrote:
>
> > You could also modify tor to use single-hop connections, then measure
> > single-hop bandwidth, by
> making a 1-hop connection and pushing data through it. There won't be as
> much client crypto as the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/04/2015 06:19 PM, teor wrote:
>
> make test-network is dominated by the 25 second delay waiting for the
Tor test network to bootstrap. So it's not going to help much.
>
> I'm working on a chutney branch to measure bandwidth on "chutney
verify"
Thanks Nick!
created #16506 to track this work.
Cheers, Isabela
On 07/03/2015 11:46 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> I'm about to go on vacation, but before I started, Isabela asked me
> for coverage information on Tor, to help people decide where more
> tests should be written.
>
> I've re-run cover
Hi nusenu,
> A few comments:
>
> - - the page seems to be AS name centric
> - first column of the table is AS name
> - only clickable column in the table is AS name
>
> - - the AS column suggests that all relays in a family run in one AS only
>
> - - the family page of a specific family show
Hi Philipp,
> - I searched for my relay family by fingerprint and the resulting page's
> URL didn't contain my family, so I couldn't send the URL to somebody
> else.
Could you give me some more details about this? Currently the search bar
supports all running relays.
The URL will contain th
