Re: [tor-dev] packaging advice needed

2015-07-11 Thread Tom van der Woerdt
Magnus Hedemark schreef op 11/07/15 om 04:35: Hello, I have set up a Jenkins CI server and have it tracking the Tor project's git repository. I'm going to be building packages for the OmniOS platform, which is not yet supported. I tried searching the site for advice for packagers but haven't

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 246: Defending Against Guard Discovery Attacks using Vanguards

2015-07-11 Thread s7r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello, Estimations look good. I think second_guard_set third_guard_set should not have the same requirements like how any Tor client chooses the guard (first hop). We can select second guards and third guards by requiring for example just Stable

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 246: Defending Against Guard Discovery Attacks using Vanguards

2015-07-11 Thread s7r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I find it better to add a new consensus flag called 'Vanguard' which will be assigned to relays with lower requirements than the 'Guard' (less bandwidth, just the Stable flag). We will then select second_guard_set and third_guard_set from relays

[tor-dev] Per-transport bridge bandwidth and bridge counts

2015-07-11 Thread David Fifield
I made some graphs that show the count and total bandwidth of all bridges, broken down by transport. https://people.torproject.org/~dcf/graphs/pt-bandwidth-2015-07-11/pt-bandwidth.png https://people.torproject.org/~dcf/graphs/pt-bandwidth-2015-07-11/pt-count.png The top part of

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 246: Defending Against Guard Discovery Attacks using Vanguards

2015-07-11 Thread Matthew Finkel
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 03:50:16PM +0300, s7r wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I find it better to add a new consensus flag called 'Vanguard' which will be assigned to relays with lower requirements than the 'Guard' (less bandwidth, just the Stable flag). We will then

Re: [tor-dev] packaging advice needed

2015-07-11 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:35:57PM -0400, Magnus Hedemark wrote: I tried searching the site for advice for packagers but haven't found any. If I've overlooked it, I'd appreciate a nudge in the right direction. I think our current advice is do it like the deb does it.

Re: [tor-dev] Tor Browser videos Automation

2015-07-11 Thread Sherief Alaa
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Arthur D. Edelstein arthuredelst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Sherief, Karsten insisted that I have to run a local copy of torproject.org http://torproject.org using a web server while the automated script runs since we can't estimate or depend on the connection

Re: [tor-dev] Per-transport bridge bandwidth and bridge counts

2015-07-11 Thread Arlo Breault
I don't know where observed bandwidth comes from. Is there some kind of external test that measures it, or does it come from measuring user traffic? From bandwidth auths running torflow, no? https://gitweb.torproject.org/torflow.git/tree/README ___

Re: [tor-dev] Tor Browser videos Automation

2015-07-11 Thread Arthur D. Edelstein
Hi Sherief, I gave it a try and to get it to work I had to do the following (Note steps 2, 3 and 4 are very bad for your privacy!): 1. Add torproject.org as an alias to localhost in /etc/hosts 2. Deactivate HTTPS Everywhere 3. Create test.currentTimeOffsetSeconds integer pref and set to 11491200