On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 17:55:51 -0400 (EDT)
"Steve Snyder" wrote:
> Given a contemporary release of Tor with a contemporary version of
> OpenSSL, under what circumstances is the intrinsic curve25519_donna()
> preferred over the libsodium/NaCl crypto_scalarmult_curve25519(), or
> vice versa?
A quick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 8/4/2015 5:42 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> Hi, s7r!
>
> This is an impressive writeup; thanks!
>
> One thing that makes it hard for me to follow this document is
> that I'm not sure which parts are describing how things work _now_,
> and which pa
Given a contemporary release of Tor with a contemporary version of OpenSSL,
under what circumstances is the intrinsic curve25519_donna() preferred over the
libsodium/NaCl crypto_scalarmult_curve25519(), or vice versa?
Does it come down to 32-bit vs. 64-bit? Or CPU instruction sets detected at
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 04:22:19PM -0400, l.m wrote:
> I know I've already mentioned some thoughts on this subject. I would
> be interested in your thoughts on the types of challenging questions
> such a hypothetical DSL might answer. I've already put some effort
> into this (forking metrics-lib),
> On 4 Aug 2015, at 22:00 , George Kadianakis wrote:
>
>>> XXX The number of active participants is dynamic as authorities leave and
>>> join the protocol. Since the number of active participants is dynamic ,
>>> an attacker could trick some authorities believing there are N
>>> part
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 6:55 PM, s7r wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi,
>
> Tor 0.2.7.x will support Ed25519 router identities along with the
> traditional 1024-bit RSA ones which will be used simultaneously for
> some time, until we will completely deprecate RSA rou
> On 4 Aug 2015, at 22:00 , George Kadianakis wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> and thanks for the comments.
>
> I uploaded a new version of the proposal that addresses some of your feedback.
>
> You can find it here:
> https://gitweb.torproject.org/user/asn/torspec.git/log/?h=rng-draft-v4-asn
Thanks f
teor writes:
>> On 4 Aug 2015, at 00:03 , George Kadianakis wrote:
>> …
>
>> 3.1.2. Shared Random Document During Commitment Phase [SRDOCCOMMIT]
> …
Hello,
and thanks for the comments.
I uploaded a new version of the proposal that addresses some of your feedback.
You can find it here:
http
