Re: [tor-dev] Should cloud-hosted relays be rejected?

2015-09-01 Thread nusenu
>> I don't think banning GCE, AWS and MS Azure is an efficient method >> to >>> significantly increase the cost of attacks because it is trivial >>> for an attacker to quickly spin up "a large number of disposable >>> machines" at other ISPs as well. > It has other benefits. Those big providers

Re: [tor-dev] Should cloud-hosted relays be rejected?

2015-09-01 Thread tordev123
From: nusenu To: tor-dev@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-dev] Should cloud-hosted relays be rejected? Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 00:58:05 +0200 > I don't think banning GCE, AWS and MS Azure is an efficient method to > significantly increase the cost of attacks because

Re: [tor-dev] Should cloud-hosted relays be rejected?

2015-09-01 Thread Michael McConville
tordev...@safe-mail.net wrote: > > I don't think banning GCE, AWS and MS Azure is an efficient method > > to significantly increase the cost of attacks because it is trivial > > for an attacker to quickly spin up "a large number of disposable > > machines" at other ISPs as well. > > It has other