Hello everyone,
I am pleased to announce the second release of the Onion Name System (OnioNS)
for beta testing. This release represents about 180 commits and is a major
update from my last release. The two servers should be up long-term, so feel
free to play around with it. "Example.tor" is li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/29/2015 07:39 AM, Jeff Burdges wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 00:59 +, Jeremy Rand wrote:
>
>> The issue I do see is that SPV validation doesn't work well
>> unless you ask multiple peers to make sure that you're getting
>> the chain with
> On 29 Sep 2015, at 09:39, Jeff Burdges wrote:
>
>> The issue I do see is that SPV validation doesn't work well unless
>> you
>> ask multiple peers to make sure that you're getting the chain with
>> the
>> most PoW. So I gather that this would require connecting to Namecoin
>> peers running on
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 00:59 +, Jeremy Rand wrote:
> Do I infer correctly that the main intention of this is to decrease
> the possibility of attack by a Sybil attack on the Namecoin network,
> by making the Namecoin peer selection process have similar properties
> to Tor relay selection (which
On 09/29/2015 12:19 AM, Jeff Burdges wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 16:26 -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 03:20:47PM +0200, Jeff Burdges wrote:
>>> I proposed that Tor implement NameService rules using UNIX domain
>>> sockets, or ports, since that's how GNUNet works, but m
