There is an error in the javascript syntax in https-anywhere which the test
bypasses.
I have issued it in the github link
https://github.com/EFForg/https-everywhere/issues/6761.
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 10:49 PM, AKASH DAS wrote:
> If I have to make any patch in the code, do I
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 09:01:01 -0400
Jesse V wrote:
> On 09/05/2016 12:43 AM, meejah wrote:
> > Could you use ADD_ONION instead? Why are you using the on-disk API
> > if you don't want to give your thing permission to read those
> > directories?
>
> I'll consider it, but I
On 09/05/2016 01:19 PM, AKASH DAS wrote:
> If I have to make any patch in the code, do I have to submit it in this
> mailing list or https-everywhere's mailing list? Just a doubt
What are you trying to patch? If you are trying to add a URL to their
whitelist, you don't need to submit a patch as
If I have to make any patch in the code, do I have to submit it in this
mailing list or https-everywhere's mailing list? Just a doubt
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 10:35 PM, David Fifield
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 10:28:26PM +0530, AKASH DAS wrote:
> > Can I know the
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 10:28:26PM +0530, AKASH DAS wrote:
> Can I know the issues that are currently in https everywhere.
I don't know if this is what you're looking for, but here are some open
bug tracker tickets.
On 09/05/2016 12:58 PM, AKASH DAS wrote:
> Can I know the issues that are currently in https everywhere.
This is the mailing list for Tor development, so you may want to
redirect your question to the EFF or some different channel.
HTTPS Everywhere has been really smooth for me and I've actually
Respected all,
Can I know the issues that are currently in https everywhere.
--
*Akash Das*
*Student Systems Admin*
*Indian Institute Of Information Technology*
*Sricity*
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
On 09/05/2016 12:43 AM, meejah wrote:
> Could you use ADD_ONION instead? Why are you using the on-disk API if
> you don't want to give your thing permission to read those directories?
I'll consider it, but I want the onion service to be relatively
permanent. It would best if the hostname didn't