> Think I'm on dev-tor list now - sorry for spamming - all family info
> should be up to date now
Thank you for fixing this so fast!
+--+---+
| nickname | MyFamilyCount |
+--+---+
| SnapTorSTRAS |8. |
| SnapTorSNPR |8.
Think I'm on dev-tor list now - sorry for spamming - all family info should be
up to date now
regards
Mark B
> On 8 Dec 2016, at 14:07, Sec INT wrote:
>
> Should all be correct now
>
> regards
>
> Mark B
>
>
>> On 8 Dec 2016, at 11:56, nusenu wrote:
>>
>> Dear snaptorg tor operator,
>
> I do not think that this is worthwhile. It establishes a precedent where
> setting your contact info is something that gets you banned, potentially
> incorrectly because it's unauthenticated, whereas we're unable to identify
> people who actually maliciously run several relays without such indica
Dear tor directory authorities,
TLDR: Would you blacklist relays with end-to-end correlation capabilities?
I'm asking to find out whether it makes sense to put any effort into
finding such operators [2]. If most dir auths would not blacklist such
relays than it does not make sense to look for the
Dear snaptorg tor operator,
teor wrote [1]:
> TL;DR: we're talking about blacklisting your non-exit relays,
> because they don't have MyFamily set correctly.
>
> If you'd like help configuring MyFamily correctly, please let us know.
If you are wondering which relay is misconfigured, the last c
