Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal for the encoding of prop224 onion addresses

2017-01-27 Thread chelsea komlo
Hey! > Here is some extra pressure for you ;). :) thanks, I will try! Before starting, someone today very kindly pointed me to Prop 271, the naming system API for Tor Onion services. Overall, my larger concern is whether adding the version in the onion address makes both using and distributing

[tor-dev] tor 0.2.9.9 gcc 4.2.1

2017-01-27 Thread grarpamp
Ancient gcc says src/or/connection.c:1843: warning: passing argument 1 of 'TO_OR_CONN' discards qualifiers from pointer target type src/or/connection.c:1843: warning: passing argument 1 of 'TO_OR_CONN' discards qualifiers from pointer target type src/test/test_dir.c:3700: warning: assuming signed

[tor-dev] onionoo: understanding 'exit_policy_v6_summary'

2017-01-27 Thread nusenu
Hi Karsten, given this torrc configuration and exit policy: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2017-January/011806.html would you expect onionoo's 'exit_policy_v6_summary' to be not set? [1] https://onionoo.torproject.org/protocol.html#details writes: > Missing if the relay

Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal for the encoding of prop224 onion addresses

2017-01-27 Thread David Goulet
On 27 Jan (09:04:51), chelsea komlo wrote: > Hello! > > I have some more thoughts on versioning, specifically in regards to the > possibility of not including the version in the onion address and using > only the version field in the descriptor. > > I'm not able to write out these scenarios now

Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal for the encoding of prop224 onion addresses

2017-01-27 Thread chelsea komlo
Hello! I have some more thoughts on versioning, specifically in regards to the possibility of not including the version in the onion address and using only the version field in the descriptor. I'm not able to write out these scenarios now but I will do this in the next day. Thanks for making

Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal for the encoding of prop224 onion addresses

2017-01-27 Thread George Kadianakis
David Goulet writes: > On 24 Jan (14:27:43), George Kadianakis wrote: >> s7r writes: >> >> > > I like this quite a bit! Simple, easy, and trivial to understand. 56 > characters address, after that it will be the time to improve UX/UI with all > sorts of