Re: [tor-dev] Comments on proposal 279 (Name API)

On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:44:03 +0100 Alec Muffett wrote: > If I was in charge, I would say that we risk overthinking this, and it > would be better to: > >- mandate use of fully DNS-compliant syntax, including but not > limited to: acceptable max length, max label

Re: [tor-dev] Comments on proposal 279 (Name API)

> > > I suggest that we require all address suffixes to end with .onion; > > other TLDs are not reserved like .onion is, and maybe we shouldn't > > squat any we haven't squatted already. > > FWIW it's not at all clear to me that this is a concern that IETF or > ICANN will care about. Hi. My

Re: [tor-dev] Comments on proposal 279 (Name API)

On 04/06/2017 09:13 AM, Jeremy Rand wrote: > Hi Nick! > > Nick Mathewson: >> Section 2.1 and elsewhere: > >> I suggest that we require all address suffixes to end with .onion; >> other TLDs are not reserved like .onion is, and maybe we shouldn't >> squat any we haven't squatted already. > >