Hello,
Thank you for this great summary :)
On 2018-03-20 04:57, Mike Perry wrote:
Arguments for staying with just one guard:
1. One guard means less observability.
As Roger put it in the above blog post: "I think the analysis of the
network-level adversary in Aaron's paper is the strongest
Mike Perry:
> 2. Guard fingerprintability is lower with one guard
> An adversary who is watching netflow connection records for an entire
> area is able to track users as they move from internet connection to
> internet connection through the degree of uniqueness of their guard
> choice. There is
