On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 09:40:49AM +1000, teor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This proposal seems good to me.
>
> > On 20 Sep 2018, at 02:20, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> >
> > I propose that when deciding whether to shut down because of
> > subprotocol requirements, a Tor implementation should only shut
> >
Hi,
This proposal seems good to me.
> On 20 Sep 2018, at 02:20, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>
> I propose that when deciding whether to shut down because of
> subprotocol requirements, a Tor implementation should only shut
> down if the consensus is dated to some time after the
> implementati
Filename: 297-safer-protover-shutdowns.txt
Title: Relaxing the protover-based shutdown rules
Author: Nick Mathewson
Created: 19-Sep-2018
Status: Open
Target: 0.3.5.x
1. Introduction
In proposal 264 (now implemented) we introduced the subprotocol
versioning mechanism to better handle forward
