On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 02:47:23PM +0100, Iain Learmonth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 20/09/18 00:51, Ian Goldberg wrote:
> > If you make it use, say, the timestamp on the tip git commit of the
> > source, then it's (a) automated, and (b) reproducible. But that's more
> > of a build date than a release
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 7:41 PM teor wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This proposal seems good to me.
>
> > On 20 Sep 2018, at 02:20, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> >
> > I propose that when deciding whether to shut down because of
> > subprotocol requirements, a Tor implementation should only shut
> > down if
Hi,
On 20/09/18 00:51, Ian Goldberg wrote:
> If you make it use, say, the timestamp on the tip git commit of the
> source, then it's (a) automated, and (b) reproducible. But that's more
> of a build date than a release date, of course. (That's what otr uses.)
Please don't make your build
