Hi,
without checking the list archive,
On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 16:42:16 +0330
sarpedon montecarlo wrote:
> My problem here, is that I am handling the routing and stream
> attaching all by myself and I can not use the provided
> IsolateSocksStream option because I am handling the circuit
>
Hey y'all,
For the past little while I've been working on a technical overview doc for
#3600 (Prevent redirects from transmitting+storing cookies+identifiers)
detailing the problems, scenarios and possible solutions. Please take a look
and feel free to comment, edit or add!
Link:
Well I think this is a great feature and it's something which people have
been requesting for a while now, and which I know was discussed at the PT
meeting at the last TorDev. I think this is the sort of feature that just
makes transports better for everyone, both transport designers and
Greetings tor-dev!
We've been working on improving PT reporting towards Tor so for instance Tor
Browser can better inform the user or take actions based on the PT state when
connecting to the network.
The following ticket summarize it:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/28180
To
Hi!
I am supposed to implement, a python application that runs tor in
background.
The running tor is under direct control of the python app via control port.
This running tor, is the proxy for the Tor Browser; By this I mean, when
the Tor Browser starts, it will connect to this process, instead of
Hi,
On 23/10/18 18:15, Alec Muffett wrote:
> But any website that takes an interest (e.g. tracks Cloudflare's
> "xx-tor" country geolocation, or whatever it is called) - regarding the
> reputation of the source IP address will KNOW that the user is coming
> from Tor.
>
> We live in a weird
