teor:
> Hi juga,
>
> I read your meeting notes from this week's network team meeting:
>
> juga(offline):
>Week of 05/20 (planned)
> - Add Tor version to the bandwidth file (#30196)
>Week of 05/20 (actual)
>Week of 06/03 (plan)
> - Continue with #30406: Refactor header
Hi,
> On 4 Jun 2019, at 12:54, Mike Perry wrote:
>
> teor:
>>
>>
>>> On 4 Jun 2019, at 06:20, Mike Perry wrote:
>>>
>>> Mike Perry:
teor:
> I have an alternative proposal:
>
> Let's deploy sbws to half the bandwidth authorities, wait 2 weeks, and
> see if exit
teor:
> Hi Mike,
>
>> On 4 Jun 2019, at 06:20, Mike Perry wrote:
>>
>> Mike Perry:
>>> teor:
I have an alternative proposal:
Let's deploy sbws to half the bandwidth authorities, wait 2 weeks, and
see if exit bandwidths improve.
We should measure the impact of this
Hi Mike,
> On 4 Jun 2019, at 06:20, Mike Perry wrote:
>
> Mike Perry:
>> teor:
>>> I have an alternative proposal:
>>>
>>> Let's deploy sbws to half the bandwidth authorities, wait 2 weeks, and
>>> see if exit bandwidths improve.
>>>
>>> We should measure the impact of this change using the
Mike Perry:
> teor:
>> I have an alternative proposal:
>>
>> Let's deploy sbws to half the bandwidth authorities, wait 2 weeks, and
>> see if exit bandwidths improve.
>>
>> We should measure the impact of this change using the tor-scaling
>> measurement criteria. (And we should make sure it
teor:
> I have an alternative proposal:
>
> Let's deploy sbws to half the bandwidth authorities, wait 2 weeks, and
> see if exit bandwidths improve.
>
> We should measure the impact of this change using the tor-scaling
> measurement criteria. (And we should make sure it doesn't conflict
> with
Hi,
> On 3 Jun 2019, at 17:48, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 10:43:14PM +1000, teor wrote:
>> Let's deploy sbws to half the bandwidth authorities, wait 2 weeks, and
>> see if exit bandwidths improve.
>>
>> We should measure the impact of this change using the tor-scaling
George Kadianakis writes:
> George Kadianakis writes:
>
>> juanjo writes:
>>
>>> Ok, thanks, I was actually thinking about PoW on the Introduction Point
>>> itself, but it would need to add a round trip, like some sort of
>>> "authentication based PoW" before allowing to send the INTRODUCE1
On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 10:11:46PM +1000, teor wrote:
> The relay's recent history is a bit more complicated. This fingerprint has
> only been around since October 2018.
Actually, no, it's been around since something like 2006. But it looks
like it was a small relay in recent years, until it
On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 10:43:14PM +1000, teor wrote:
> Let's deploy sbws to half the bandwidth authorities, wait 2 weeks, and
> see if exit bandwidths improve.
>
> We should measure the impact of this change using the tor-scaling
> measurement criteria. (And we should make sure it doesn't
10 matches
Mail list logo
