On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 13:42, Mark Smith wrote:
>
> On 6/21/19 8:50 PM, Tom Ritter wrote:
> > The attached is a draft proposal for allowing tor to lie to an
> > application about the SOCKS connection enabling it to send data
> > optimistically.
> >
> > It's going to need some fleshing out in ways
On 6/21/19 8:50 PM, Tom Ritter wrote:
> The attached is a draft proposal for allowing tor to lie to an
> application about the SOCKS connection enabling it to send data
> optimistically.
>
> It's going to need some fleshing out in ways I am not familiar with,
> but I wanted to get something out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Thanks everyone for the excellent feedback, that was very helpful in
understanding the issues at play.
s7r:
> But this is not the proper way to use Bitcoin behind Tor. So stream
> isolation for clearnet type circuits shouldn't even be a concern.
>
Hi Iain,
Thanks for your review!
> On 2 Jul 2019, at 19:39, Iain Learmonth wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> Hi,
>
> My comments are inline.
>
>> Filename: 306-ipv6-happy-eyeballs.txt Title: A Tor Implementation of
>> IPv6 Happy Eyeballs Author: Neel Chauhan Created: 25-Jun-2019
>> Supercedes:
Hi,
My comments are inline.
> Filename: 306-ipv6-happy-eyeballs.txt Title: A Tor Implementation of
> IPv6 Happy Eyeballs Author: Neel Chauhan Created: 25-Jun-2019
> Supercedes: 299 Status: Open Ticket:
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/29801
>
> 1. Introduction
>
> As IPv4
