Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 312: Automatic Relay IPv6 Addresses

2020-02-03 Thread Mirimir
On 02/03/2020 02:17 PM, s7r wrote: > In the current form of this proposal, it looks kind of optional ("We > propose this optional change, to improve..."). I propose removing the > line which contains "this optional change" and changing the following: > > In practice, each operating system has

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 312: Automatic Relay IPv6 Addresses

2020-02-03 Thread s7r
Hi teor, teor wrote: > Hi s7r, > > Thanks for bringing up IPv6 address privacy extensions. > >> On 30 Jan 2020, at 02:19, s7r wrote: >> > > I read RFCs 4941 and 3041, looked at the tor directory spec, and did some > analysis: > * tor clients get new relay addresses within 4.5 hours > * IPv6

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 312: Automatic Relay IPv6 Addresses

2020-02-03 Thread teor
Hi s7r, Thanks for bringing up IPv6 address privacy extensions. > On 30 Jan 2020, at 02:19, s7r wrote: > > There is another RFC (older), that is in use by Debian apparently: > RFC3041. https://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3041.txt > > From: >