Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 316: FlashFlow: A Secure Speed Test for Tor (Parent Proposal)

2020-04-24 Thread teor
Hi Matt, Thanks for the quick response! I've trimmed the conversation to the comments that need further discussion. > On 25 Apr 2020, at 06:46, Matt Traudt wrote: > > On 4/23/20 21:05, teor wrote: >> ... >> >>> - msm_duration [1 byte] >> >> What are the minimum and maximum valid values for

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 316: FlashFlow: A Secure Speed Test for Tor (Parent Proposal)

2020-04-24 Thread Matt Traudt
Thanks for the review, Teor. We really appreciate it. Comments/responses inline with some trimming at the beginning (I gave up and just left everything in after the first couple of responses). On 4/23/20 21:05, teor wrote: > ... > > But I'm particularly concerned about any communication between

Re: [tor-dev] Building a privacy-preserving "contact tracing" app

2020-04-24 Thread carlo von lynX
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 11:11:12AM +0200, Jeff Burdges wrote: > Ignoring the nasty political realities, there are cute mixnet tricks for > contact tracing apps: Sounds like a neat approach, Jeff. -- E-mail is public! Talk to me in private using encryption: //

Re: [tor-dev] Building a privacy-preserving "contact tracing" app

2020-04-24 Thread Jeff Burdges
>> The French state is making a glosing about the "privacy-preserving", >> "anonymous" contact tracing app they are developing with Inria (national >> informatics research agency). You can check about the protocol proposal, >> ROBERT, here: https://github.com/ROBERT-proximity-tracing/documents

Re: [tor-dev] Building a privacy-preserving "contact tracing" app

2020-04-24 Thread teor
Hi Adrien, > On 22 Apr 2020, at 16:35, Adrien Luxey wrote: > > The French state is making a glosing about the "privacy-preserving", > "anonymous" contact tracing app they are developing with Inria (national > informatics research agency). You can check about the protocol proposal, > ROBERT,