Hi Mike,
My apologies. I thought this later email from 14th April had the
latest version of the proposal:
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2020-April/014225.html
> In short, we let the queue grow at a faster rate than we serve, and we
> trim it occasionally.
What is the benefit of
Hi tevador,
On 5/8/20 2:53 PM, tevador wrote:
> Including the effort has 2 benefits:
>
> 1. In case the Intro Priority Queue is full, the service doesn't need to
>waste time verifying PoW solutions that have effort lower than the last
>element in the queue. While an attacker
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:46:42AM +1000, teor wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> > On 14 May 2020, at 00:09, David Goulet wrote:
> >
> > On 11 May (16:47:53), Nick Mathewson wrote:
> >
> >> ```
> >> Filename: 320-tap-out-again.md
> >> Title: Removing TAP usage from v2 onion services
> >> Author: Nick
Nick Mathewson wrote:
> ```
> Filename: 320-tap-out-again.md
> Title: Removing TAP usage from v2 onion services
> Author: Nick Mathewson
> Created: 11 May 2020
> Status: Open
> ```
>
> (This proposal is part of the Walking Onions spec project. It updates
> proposal 245.)
>
> # Removing TAP
Hi Nick,
> On 14 May 2020, at 00:09, David Goulet wrote:
>
> On 11 May (16:47:53), Nick Mathewson wrote:
>
>> ```
>> Filename: 320-tap-out-again.md
>> Title: Removing TAP usage from v2 onion services
>> Author: Nick Mathewson
>> Created: 11 May 2020
>> Status: Open
>> ```
>>
>> (This
On 11 May (16:47:53), Nick Mathewson wrote:
Hello!
> ```
> Filename: 320-tap-out-again.md
> Title: Removing TAP usage from v2 onion services
> Author: Nick Mathewson
> Created: 11 May 2020
> Status: Open
> ```
>
> (This proposal is part of the Walking Onions spec project. It updates
> proposal
