(sorry for replying directly before)
On 2021-10-03 16:16, nusenu-lists at riseup.net wrote:
Hi,
I wrote down a spec for a simple web of trust
for relay operator IDs:
Some comments, in no particular order:
Why not just put the keys in directly, or even a magnet link to your
latest web of
While I understand the rationale for proposals such as these and agree there is
a problem with malicious relays on the network, I feel that proposals such as
these:
- Raise the barrier for entry. People that would like to contribute to the
network by running a relay or several relays would
current version of the text:
https://nusenu.github.io/tor-relay-operator-ids-trust-information/
Some comments, in no particular order:
Why not just put the keys in directly, or even a magnet link to your
latest web of trust? That would remove the need to trust SSL CAs.
Since the spec does
Hi,
thanks for your input.
There will be a new iteration of the draft and I will reply to your email
again once that is done, as it should cover some of the areas you mentioned.
kind regards,
nusenu
yanma...@cock.li:
(sorry for replying directly before)
On 2021-10-03 16:16, nusenu-lists at
Maybe you would like to open a merge request or post it on tor-dev in its
entirety so we can comment? Whatever you prefer.
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/torspec/-/merge_requests/49
--
https://nusenu.github.io
___
tor-dev mailing list
On 03 Oct (18:16:05), nusenu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wrote down a spec for a simple web of trust
> for relay operator IDs:
>
>
Hi,
I wrote down a spec for a simple web of trust
for relay operator IDs:
https://gitlab.torproject.org/nusenu/torspec/-/blob/simple-wot-for-relay-operator-ids/proposals/ideas/xxx-simple-relay-operator-wot.md#a-simple-web-of-trust-for-tor-relay-operator-ids
This is related to:
