Re: [tor-dev] Bandwidth scanner: request for feedback

2018-11-20 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 7:36 AM teor wrote: > > Hi, > > We have deployed sbws on one bandwidth authority (longclaw). > > Here's a request for additional feedback, and a progress update: > > > Request for Feedback: Relay Bandwidth Self-Tests > > Torflow and sbws use relays' self-reported observed

Re: [tor-dev] Bandwidth scanner: request for feedback

2018-11-19 Thread teor
Hi, We have deployed sbws on one bandwidth authority (longclaw). Here's a request for additional feedback, and a progress update: Request for Feedback: Relay Bandwidth Self-Tests Torflow and sbws use relays' self-reported observed bandwidths for load balancing. But relays can have really low

Re: [tor-dev] Bandwidth scanner: request for feedback

2018-08-30 Thread Tom Ritter
On 29 August 2018 at 16:11, Mike Perry wrote: > Ideally, I would like us to perform A/B experiments to ensure that our > performance metrics do not degrade in terms of average *or* quartile > range/performance variance. (Ie: alternate torflow results for a week vs > sbws for a week, and repeat

Re: [tor-dev] Bandwidth scanner: request for feedback

2018-08-29 Thread Mike Perry
teor: > Hi, > > Juga and pastly have been working hard on sbws. > > Sbws' results are now similar to torflow's results: > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/27135/20180826_081902.png Congratulations, Juga and pastly! > Now that sbws is close to torflow, we want some

[tor-dev] Bandwidth scanner: request for feedback

2018-08-26 Thread teor
Hi, Juga and pastly have been working hard on sbws. Sbws' results are now similar to torflow's results: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/27135/20180826_081902.png Now that sbws is close to torflow, we want some feedback on its design. We’ll work on the design at the