> You asked your bridge for its server descriptor and it gave it to you.
>
> Did you try:
> print
> controller.get_extrainfo_descriptors("8B5F0BD647B3C4AF2C57F148FF6A1FB8B695B0AE")
>
>
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 11:51:04PM +1000, teor wrote:
>
> Can you get logs (and torrcs) from those bridges to confirm whether
> they think they are producing extra info descriptors?
I've asked the operator but not gotten a reply yet.
___
tor-dev
> On 5 Jun 2017, at 15:53, David Fifield wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 03:15:08PM +1000, teor wrote:
>>
>>> On 5 Jun 2017, at 15:06, David Fifield wrote:
>>>
>>> Calling get_extrainfo_descriptors from stem.descriptor.remote returns an
>>>
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 03:15:08PM +1000, teor wrote:
>
> > On 5 Jun 2017, at 15:06, David Fifield wrote:
> >
> > Calling get_extrainfo_descriptors from stem.descriptor.remote returns an
> > empty list. (499D92E08769BFC0B7941C74031335B9EC9E9BAE is the new
> >
> On 5 Jun 2017, at 15:06, David Fifield wrote:
>
>> You asked your bridge for its server descriptor and it gave it to you.
>>
>> Did you try:
>> print
>> controller.get_extrainfo_descriptors("8B5F0BD647B3C4AF2C57F148FF6A1FB8B695B0AE")
>>
>>
Thanks for your informative reply.
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 02:37:00PM +1000, teor wrote:
>
> > On 2 Jun 2017, at 08:20, David Fifield wrote:
> >
> > ...
> > And this Stem script:
> > from stem.control import Controller
> > with Controller.from_port(port = 9051)
> On 2 Jun 2017, at 08:20, David Fifield wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 09:31:45PM -0700, David Fifield wrote:
>> On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 09:25:11AM -0700, David Fifield wrote:
>>> Okay, thanks. It still doesn't fully make sense to me, because while
>>> some of the
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 09:31:45PM -0700, David Fifield wrote:
> On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 09:25:11AM -0700, David Fifield wrote:
> > Okay, thanks. It still doesn't fully make sense to me, because while
> > some of the default bridges are in Atlas, not all of them are (for
> > example the two from
On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 09:25:11AM -0700, David Fifield wrote:
> Okay, thanks. It still doesn't fully make sense to me, because while
> some of the default bridges are in Atlas, not all of them are (for
> example the two from https://bugs.torproject.org/21917). I don't think
> it's possible that