On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:54:22AM -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> > If possible, we'd still like confirmation of (1) whether this is a good
> > characterization of the constraints involved when using a Tor bridge,
> > and (2) if 4.2 is the right part of tor-spec to cite for clients
> >
On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 12:15:05AM -0700, David Fifield wrote:
> The Snowflake paper has been conditionally accepted to Usenix Security
> and we are now working on final revisions.
Congrats! This is great!
> If possible, we'd still like confirmation of (1) whether this is a good
>
The Snowflake paper has been conditionally accepted to Usenix Security
and we are now working on final revisions. As before, no response is
necessary, but if you have any comments, we can try to take them into
account up until about 2024-02-26. This is a current snapshot:
Cecylia, Arlo, Serene, Shelikhoo, and I are writing a research paper
about Snowflake. Here is a draft:
https://www.bamsoftware.com/papers/snowflake/snowflake.20231003.e6e1c30d.pdf
We're writing to check a factual claim in the section about having
multiple backend bridges. Basically, we wanted it
