On 4/3/16, Griffin Boyce wrote:
> How do you transmit an elephant? One byte at a time...
>
> But on a serious note, it's possible to transfer 2.6TB over Tor in small
> pieces (such as file by file or via torrent). Given the size, however, I'd
> suspect they mailed hard
NB: Sorry for breaking the threading. Replying to the right message.
dawuud:
> Alice and Bob can share lots of files and they can do so with their
> Tor onion services. They should be able to exchange files without
> requiring them to be online at the same time. Are you sure you've
> choosen the
On 4/04/2016 10:31 AM, Griffin Boyce wrote:
How do you transmit an elephant? One byte at a time...
rsync is a beautiful thing. Have different clients / nodes accessing
separate file paths. If the transfer drops out / is too slow, start up
rsync again..
Hi.
My general feeling here is that it's more useful for me to tell you how I think
people should share files than it would be for me to answer your questions;
sorry, not sorry.
Alice and Bob can share lots of files and they can do so with their Tor onion
services.
They should be able to
Recently someone leaked enormous amount of docs (2.6 TiB) to the
journalists [1]. It's still hard to do such thing even over plain old
Internet. Highly possible that these docs were transfered on a physical
hard drive despite doing so is really *risky*.
Anyways, in the framework of anonymous
How do you transmit an elephant? One byte at a time...
But on a serious note, it's possible to transfer 2.6TB over Tor in small
pieces (such as file by file or via torrent). Given the size, however, I'd
suspect they mailed hard drives after establishing contact with
journalists. Even on a
Recently someone leaked enormous amount of docs (2.6 TiB) to the
journalists [1]. It's still hard to do such thing even over plain old
Internet. Highly possible that these docs were transfered on a physical
hard drive despite doing so is really *risky*.
Anyways, in the framework of anonymous